forked from w3c/csswg-drafts
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-wd-20150917.bsi
More file actions
237 lines (236 loc) · 8.17 KB
/
issues-wd-20150917.bsi
File metadata and controls
237 lines (236 loc) · 8.17 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-grid-1-20150917/
Title: CSS Grid Layout Level 1
----
Issue 1.
Summary: Default alignment of grid tracks should match Flexbox
From: fantasai & Javier Fernandez
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0022.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0026.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0121.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified: reporter is editor
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0031.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary: Confusion over implicit named areas
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0040.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0072.html
Closed: Invalid
Verified:
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 3.
Summary: Abspos item placement in degenerate grids
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0088.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0098.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0131.html
Open: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 4.
Summary: Errors in overlarge clamping rule
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0033.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0068.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 5.
Summary: Missing start = end conflict handling rule
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0034.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0069.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 6.
Summary: Clarifying percentage resolution against indefinite sizing
From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0046.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0074.html
Closed: OutOfScope
Note: Filed against CSS Sizing
Verified:
Resolved:
----
Issue 7.
Summary: Confusion over baseline content alignment and baseline self alignment
From: Javier Fernandez
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0122.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0075.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 8.
Summary: Clarify sizing under a min/max-content constraint
From: Sergio Villar Senin
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0190.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0194.html
Closed: Invalid
Verified:
Resolved:
----
Issue 9.
Summary: Clarify behavior of CSS-wide keywords and reset-only longhands
From: David Baron
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0255.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0126.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 10.
Summary: Percentages resolving against max-height
From: Tab and fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0067.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0090.html
Closed: Invalid
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0029.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary: Clarifications to repeat()
From: Mats Plamgren
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0033.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0037.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0041.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0043.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 12.
Summary: Axis ordering 2-value vs 4-value properties
From: Tab and fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0212.html
Response:
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved:
----
Issue 13.
Summary: Linking errors etc. for alignment properties
From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0030.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0055.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0084.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0062.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 14.
Summary: Percentage resolution and intrinsic sizing
From: Sergio Villar Senin
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0295.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0066.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 15.
Summary: Example is confusing
From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0110.html
Response:
Open
Verified:
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 15.
Summary: Clarification to 'fr'
From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0323.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0131.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 16.
Summary: Error: wrong axis in definition
From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0263.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0159.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 17.
Summary: Placement algo doesn't handle negative-index implicit lines
From: Menuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0088.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0160.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 18.
Summary: Errors in grid-gap propdef tables
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0028.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0072.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 19.
Summary: Grid gap suppression at fragmentation breaks
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0245.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0246.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: =WG= Approve, pls.
----
Issue 20.
Summary: Content size tracks and orthogonal flows
From: Javier Fernandez
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0255.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0128.html
Open: Needs review, possible s/min-content/min- or max-content/ edit.
----
Issue 21.
Summary: Confusion about reset-only behavior of 'grid-gap' in 'grid' shorthand
From: Luke Stebbing
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0273.html
----
Issue 22.
Summary: Errors in definition of 'auto' minimum track sizes
From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0086.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0158.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0288.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0032.html
----
Issue 23.
Summary: Tighten up definition of dropping empty tracks
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0034.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0155.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 24.
Summary: Drop empty tracks at ends or also in the middle?
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0027.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0034.html
Open: =WG= Discuss / find use cases.
----
Issue 25.
Summary: Subgrids considered essential
From: Eric Meyer
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0106.html
Open: OutOfScope
----
Issue 26.
Summary: Spanning to missing named lines: which side of the grid?
From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0063.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0123.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: =WG= Discuss.
----