forked from w3c/csswg-drafts
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-lc-2012.txt
More file actions
254 lines (225 loc) · 10 KB
/
issues-lc-2012.txt
File metadata and controls
254 lines (225 loc) · 10 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-background-20120214/
Audience: WG
Set Audience to Director for an HTML version without the Edit fields.
Currently lists all comments on www-style between Feb 14 (publication
date) and Mar 13, 2012 (comment deadline was Mar 6).
Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1.
Summary: Add background-position-x and background-position-y
From: Florian Rivoal
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0618.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0628.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0630.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary: Computed value line for 'background-repeat' is imprecise
From: David Baron
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1094.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0587.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Edited
Issue: 3
Summary: Reorder the border-*-radius definitions in the spec
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Edited
Issue: 4
Summary: “Applies to” for 'border-radius' doesn't match prose
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Edited
Issue: 5
Summary: Negative values for 'border-radius' should explicitly be illegal
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Edited
Issue: 6
Summary: Rephrase note about inner curve in 5.2
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Elika replaced “adjacent corner” by “opposite side”
and will add an image
Issue: 7
Summary: Unclear text about corner transitions in 5.4
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Edit: Changed to “Otherwise, the center
of color and style transitions
between adjoining borders must a point along the curve
that is a continuous monotonic function of the ratio of
the border widths. However it is not defined what these
transitions look like or what function maps from this
ratio to a point on the curve.”
Issue: 8
Summary: Insert “two corresponding” in the formula in 5.5
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Edited
Issue: 9
Summary: Remove para “The rendering must be exactly…” in 5.5
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Edited
Issue: 10
Summary: Example 24 should have only images A and B, D and C are the same
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Labeled the images A B B A (no C and D)
Issue: 11
Summary: Example 25 belongs in 5.1 instead of 5.6
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Edited
Issue: 12
Summary: Use “{1,2}” instead of “?” in syntax of 'border-radius'
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Edited
Issue: 13
Summary: Initial value of 'border-radius' should be “see individual properties”
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Edited
Issue: 14
Summary: Also allow to specify corners with an <angle> instead of two <length>
From: Christoph Päper
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0324.html
Response: [to be sent by Bert]
Closed: Rejected (new features are out of scope)
Issue: 15
Summary: Add a “cut” corner style (border-corner-shape: normal|curved|sharp)
From: Christoph Päper
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0324.html
Response: [to be sent by Bert]
Closed: Rejected (new features are out of scope)
Issue: 16
Summary: 'Border-image' syntax allows odd trailing slash.
Syntax should disallow it. And maybe also disallow
two slashes in a row.
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0179.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0605.html
Edit: Proposal: Solution C, disallow trailing slash in
syntax. (But still allow two
slashes with nothing in between.)
Closed: Accepted (solution C)
Edit: Edited, but needs to be verified by WG
Issue: 17
Summary: 'background' shorthand spec text fails to say that
'background-image' is reset.
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0134.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0595.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Edited
Issue: 18
Summary: Which background and border properties apply to first-line
and first-letter?
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0133.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0606.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0617.html
Edit: Proposal: Accept, all properties apply, except
that the border properties
that existed in CSS 2.1 and 'box-decoration-break' do not apply
to first-line.
Edit: Edited as above
Edit: 2nd Proposal: Accept proposal from Kenny:
“All properties in Chapter 3 apply
to ::first-line and ::first-letter. All properties in
Chapter 4 apply to ::first-letter.”
Issue: 19
Summary: Background of page area
From: Fantasai
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0127.html
Response: [to be sent by Elika]
Closed: OutOfScope (is an issue for css3-page)
Issue: 20
Summary: Rewording and more verbose grammar for bg-position
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0124.html
Response: [to be sent by Bert: better text and note added, no grammar change]
Closed: Accepted (partially)
Edit: Edited
Issue: 21
Summary: Unclear what border style is used on table cells, when
'border-image-source' doesn't apply
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0602.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Added “(or doesn't apply)” after “cannot be displayed”; and added
“otherwise the element's borders are invisible and
the border image is drawn as described in the sections below.”
Issue: 22
Summary: How exactly does border-image apply to table elements with
collapsing borders (border conflict resolution)?
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0602.html
Edit: Added “otherwise the element's borders are
invisble and the border image is drawn”.
Edit: Proposal for the rest has two options:
(A) draw the table borders with invisible
ink and then draw the image on top of it; or (B) an image border
overrides any other border in the conflict resolution. (The
difference is the calculation of the width of each cell.)
Issue 23
Summary: Ambiguous phrasing about 'inset' and tables
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0106.html
Response: [to be sent]
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Edited (copied wording from CSS 2.1: “In the collapsing
border model, drawn the same as 'ridge'.”)
Issue 24
Summary: Line thickness in 4.3 uses ambiguous words “may not”
(“may not be negative”). Should say: “are not allowed.”
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0103.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0603.html
Closed: Accepted
Edit: Edited
Issue 25
Summary: Allow colors (esp. semi-transparent ones) on all background layers.
Tab says (1st response) it's no longer needed, because you
can soon use 'image(red)' anywhere a URL is allowed, and (2nd
response) that it would throw off the layer counting for the
'background-color' property.
From: Lev Solntsev
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1338.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1341.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1365.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1373.html
Response: [Bert or Elika to send mail to ask for verification]
Closed: Rejected
Issue: 26
Summary: What is the “boundary” of a table cell?
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html
Edit: Edited: s/boundaries/far border edges/
Closed: Accepted