Added issue about the complex counter styles and whether we need them defined out that far.

Author: tabatkins

css3-lists/Overview.html

@@ -3466,6 +3466,14 @@ <h2 id=predefined-counters><span class=secno>11. </span> Complex Counter
    in an &lsquo;<code class=property>override</code>&rsquo; type, reusing the
    algorithm but swapping out some of the other descriptors.
 
+  <p class=issue>Is it necessary to define &lsquo;<code
+   class=css>ethiopian-numeric</code>&rsquo; and the longhand Chinese styles
+   out to these ranges? I have no idea if it would be common to use them in
+   the sorts of situations where you need counter-styles in the thousands or
+   higher. If they'll typically be used for only low-count use-cases, we can
+   simplify them by just making them "non-repeating" styles manually defined
+   out to 100 or so values.
+
   <h3 id=glyph-counters><span class=secno>11.1. </span> Glyphs</h3>
 
   <p>CSS 2.1 defined three single-glyph counter styles (&lsquo;<a

css3-lists/Overview.src.html

@@ -2533,6 +2533,8 @@ <h2 id='predefined-counters'>
 	described below.  For example, an author can reference one of these styles in an
 	'override' type, reusing the algorithm but swapping out some of the other descriptors.</p>
 
+	<p class='issue'>Is it necessary to define ''ethiopian-numeric'' and the longhand Chinese styles out to these ranges?  I have no idea if it would be common to use them in the sorts of situations where you need counter-styles in the thousands or higher.  If they'll typically be used for only low-count use-cases, we can simplify them by just making them "non-repeating" styles manually defined out to 100 or so values.</p>
+
 
 <h3 id='glyph-counters'>
 Glyphs</h3>