Skip to content

Commit ab4681d

Browse files
committed
[css-text-decor] Make [ right | left ] optional for text-emphasis-position per WG resolution. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
1 parent a1b23aa commit ab4681d

1 file changed

Lines changed: 5 additions & 2 deletions

File tree

css-text-decor/Overview.bs

Lines changed: 5 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -692,12 +692,13 @@ Emphasis Mark Position: the 'text-emphasis-position' property</h3>
692692

693693
<pre class="propdef">
694694
Name: text-emphasis-position
695-
Value: [ over | under ] && [ right | left ]
695+
Value: [ over | under ] && [ right | left ]?
696696
Initial: over right
697697
Inherited: yes
698698
</pre>
699699

700700
<p>This property describes where emphasis marks are drawn at.
701+
If ''[ right | left ]'' is omitted, it defaults to ''right''.
701702
The values have following meanings:</p>
702703

703704
<dl>
@@ -961,7 +962,9 @@ Changes</h2>
961962
to account for addition of ''sideways-lr'' and ''sideways-rl'' values to 'writing-mode' property.
962963
Marked orientation of emphasis marks under ''sideways-lr'' and ''sideways-rl'' undefined.
963964
(<a href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-10">Issue 10</a>, <a href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-20">Issue 20</a>)
964-
<li>Added note to indicate that initial behavior of 'text-decoration-skip' with respect to leading and trailing spaces may change.
965+
<li>Made ''[ right | left ]'' option of 'text-emphasis-position' optional.
966+
(<a href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-17">Issue 17</a>)
967+
<li>Changed text decoration to skip leading and trailing spaces.
965968
(<a href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-6">Issue 6</a>)
966969
<li>Fixed “Computed value” line for 'text-shadow'.
967970
(<a href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-7">Issue 7</a>)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)