[css-fonts-4] [varfont] Fix incorrect terminology mistake

Author: litherum

css-fonts-4/Overview.bs

@@ -1203,13 +1203,13 @@ at least as dark as its predecessor. Only values between 1 - 999 are valid, and
 	ASCII characters. axis name strings longer or shorter than four characters,
 	or containing characters outside the U+20–7E codepoint range are
 	invalid. Axis names need only
-	match a feature tag defined in the font, so they are not limited to
+	match an axis tag defined in the font, so they are not limited to
 	explicitly registered OpenType / TrueType variation axes. Fonts defining custom axis names should follow the
 	<a href="https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/fvar.htm">name rules</a>
 	defined in the OpenType specification.
 
 	Axis values not present in the font, or axis values greater or less than the range supported by the font, are ignored and therefore have no effect; a user agent must
-	not attempt to synthesize fallback behavior based on these feature tags. Other axis values
+	not attempt to synthesize fallback behavior based on these axis tags. Other axis values
 	within the same CSS 'font-variation-settings' statement are not ignored.
 
 	Values are allowed to be fractional or negative.
@@ -1321,8 +1321,13 @@ an emoji font or not, UTR51 defines a the default behavior for a given codepoint
 
 <h2 id="acknowledgments">Acknowledgments</h2>
 
+	The CSS Working group would like to thank:
+
+	Peter Constable for assorted language fixes.
+
 	Optical sizing <a href="#optical-size-example">image</a> prepared by Nick Sherman.
 
+
 <script>
 if ('ontouchstart' in window || navigator.maxTouchPoints > 0 || navigator.msMaxTouchPoints > 0) {
   var el = document.getElementsByTagName("html")[0];