You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Worklets draft contains examples of fake IDL constructs. I would expect the IDL index that appears near the end of the document to only list the IDL constructs that the spec normatively defines (WorkletGlobalScope and Worklet). However, this index, automatically generated by Bikeshed, also includes FakeWorklet, giving the feeling that the spec normatively defines that term as well.
I see that there is a way to turn off IDL processing in Bikeshed, although that's probably not what you want here, since the processing itself is useful for the Examples section. I do not know if there is a way to mark the IDL as "example" or "informative" so that Bikeshed does not include it in the IDL index. @tabatkins, is it doable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah, the fake stuff just needs to be in a non-normative section - it or an ancestor needs a class of "note", "example", or "non-normative". That's currently only indicated in prose in the spec.
The Worklets draft contains examples of fake IDL constructs. I would expect the IDL index that appears near the end of the document to only list the IDL constructs that the spec normatively defines (
WorkletGlobalScope
andWorklet
). However, this index, automatically generated by Bikeshed, also includesFakeWorklet
, giving the feeling that the spec normatively defines that term as well.I see that there is a way to turn off IDL processing in Bikeshed, although that's probably not what you want here, since the processing itself is useful for the Examples section. I do not know if there is a way to mark the IDL as "example" or "informative" so that Bikeshed does not include it in the IDL index. @tabatkins, is it doable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: