-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 792
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-2015-12.txt
More file actions
148 lines (145 loc) · 5.52 KB
/
issues-2015-12.txt
File metadata and controls
148 lines (145 loc) · 5.52 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
Draft: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/
Title: CSS Scroll Snapping Level 1
Shortname: css-scroll-snap
Issues since wrapping up the TPAC feedback in November.
Vague WG opinions at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0279.html
----
Issue 1.
Summary: Rename 'proximity' and 'mandatory'
From: Sebastian Zartner
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0177.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0006.html
Response:
Open: =WG= Discuss.
Verified:
Resolved:
----
Issue 2.
Summary: Add property to define poximity capture distance
From: Sebastian Zartner
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0178.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0182.html
Closed: Deferred
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0190.html
Resolved: Editor's discretion
----
Issue 3.
Summary: Split 'scroll-snap-type' into longhands
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0328.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0108.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0101.html
Response:
Open
Verified:
Resolved:
----
Issue 4.
Summary: Should tracking an element snap position be required?
From: Matt Rakow
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0080.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0096.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified:
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0145.html
----
Issue 5.
Summary: Remove or maintain point-snapping
From: Matt Rakow
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0177.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0096.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0102.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0103.html
Open: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0105.html
Note: Proposed to publish with it included, then remove in next publication, in order to archive proposal on /TR.
Verified:
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0353.html
----
Issue 6.
Summary: Viewport snap target area terminology
From: Matt Rakow
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0080.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0096.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0096.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0000.html
Open: =WG= Discuss
Verified:
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 7.
Summary: Logical alignment axis mismatches physical padding
From: Matt Rakow
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0090.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0133.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified:
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 8.
Summary: Remove or maintain 'edges' value?
From: Matt Rakow
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0090.html
Response: ?
Closed: Deferred
Verified:
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 9.
Summary: Rename scroll-snap-area to scroll-snap-margin
From: fantasai and Tab Atkins
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0095.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0145.html
----
Issue 10.
Summary: Need ability to skip content
From: François Remy
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0142.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0146.html
Closed: Invalid (already solved)
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0164.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary: Imprecise wording wrt out-of-range snap positions
From: Florian Rivoal
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0191.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0091.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 12
Summary: Renapping requirements wording
From: Florian Rivoal
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0109.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0111.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0091.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0145.html
----
Issue 13.
Summary: Clarify behavior of scroll-snap-align on scroll container
From: Florian Rivoal
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0192.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0212.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0227.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0095.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 14.
Summary: Indirect scrolling
From: Florian Rivoal
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0296.html #1
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0089.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0094.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 15.
Summary: Hostile mandatory snapping conflicting with target
From: Florian Rivoal
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0296.html #2
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0089.html
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----