csswg-drafts/css-text-decor/issues-lc-2013.txt at 0d2f2055703bb6bb81b171ea15717292b519c765 · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
Title:    CSS Text Decoration Level 3
Draft:    http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-text-decor-3-20130103/
Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Remove text-underline-position to allow creation of arbitrary decorations
From:     Sebastian Zartner
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0282.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0111.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified:
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Loosen position of emphasis marks when set on text with ruby
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0086.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0092.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0102.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0122.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0112.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Clarify spaces skipped by 'text-decoration-skip'
From:     Addison Phillips
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0079.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0100.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified:
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Clarify positioning of emphasis marks vs. ruby
From:     Addison Phillips
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0079.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0101.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified:
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Should visible word separators be skipped by 'text-decoration-skip: spaces'?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0100.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0113.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Drop 'text-underline-position: alphabetic'?
From:     dbaron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0529.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0578.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0139.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Define z-order of emphasis marks
From:     dbaron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0527.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0142.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Change of underline/overline z-order wrt CSS 2.1
From:     dbaron
Comm
726B
ent:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0526.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0141.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Define z-order of decorations drawn across atomic inlines
From:     dbaron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0525.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0140.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  Positioning of under/left/right underlines unclear
From:     dbaron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0530.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0143.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Line positioning per-line or across lines?
From:     dbaron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0532.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0145.html
Proposal: Mark undefined
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0105.html
Closed:   Deferred
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  Line decorations should have consistent thickness (ignoring descendants)
From:     dbaron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0533.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0146.html
Proposal: Mark undefined
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0105.html
Closed:   Deferred
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Line decorations should have consistent position (ignoring descendants)
From:     dbaron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0533.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0146.html
Proposal: Mark undefined
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0105.html
Closed:   Deferred
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  Underline positioning needs more detail
From:     dbaron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0530.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0534.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0147.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  Should text-shadow be ink color or currentColor?
From:     dbaron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0150.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0177.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  Shadow text + decorations: layer or composite?
From:     dbaron, fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/20130507060209.GA12331@crum.dbaron.org
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/51B586EA.2030502@inkedblade.net
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0105.html
Closed:   Accepted
----