csswg-drafts/css-flexbox/issues-cr-2012.txt at 122468ef273959cc19d726227775467785571eb5 · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-flexbox-20120918/
Title: CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1

Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Handling of zero-length boxes at end of line
From:     Kang-Hao Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Handling of negative-size flex lines
From:     Kang-Hao Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Need way to fill flex-item boxes / Make 'stretch' propagate definiteness
From:     Rudolph Gottesheim
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0204.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0207.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0216.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0217.html
Closed:   Open? Closed?
ACTION:   Need to check against Grid to ensure consistent behavior
Notes:    Alternative might be to reflow after stretching in order to resolve
          percentages inside the item (but treat them as auto for finding the
          flex item's size), then solve this with height: 100%.
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Constant spacing around items
From:     Giuseppe Bilotta
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0249.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0046.html
Closed:   Deferred (most cases possible; maybe add more spacing controls in next level)
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  If percentage height cannot be resolved, is the flex items stretched?
From:     Ojan Vafai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0220.html
Response: NEED TO RESPOND, ALSO NEED CSS2.1 ERRATUM
          https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15392
Open
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Clarifications to abspos static position in flex containers
From:     Kang-Hao Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0478.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Conflict in applicability of 'float' to flex items
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0675.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0698.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0691.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0701.html
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Interaction of 'stretch' and items with aspect ratio
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0781.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0040.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Transfer min/max constraints across dimensions via aspect ratio?
From:     Kang-Hao Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0010.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0041.html
Closed:   Rejected
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  Do flex items with negative margins increase available space?
From:     Tony Chang
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0460.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0462.html
Closed:   Rejected
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Stretch should clamp cross size to min/max before calculating flex base size
From:     Kang-Hao Lu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0061.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0157.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  Orthogonal Flex Layouts Sub-optimally Defined
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0251.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0260.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified:
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Should ::first-line/::first-letter apply to a flex container?
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0264.html
Response:
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  Clarify interaction of min-width and width
From:     Ojan Vafai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0046.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0050.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  Should 'overflow' apply to flex containers?
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0465.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0001.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  What should percentage margins on a flex item be relative to?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0143.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0688.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 17.
Summary:  Revert min-size of flex items to 0.
From:     Tab Atkins Jr.
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0364.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0257.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 18.
Summary:  Paint flex items and table cells atomically
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0707.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0133.html
Closed:   Accepted
Note:     Recommends corresponding CSS2.1 change for Table layout, see
          http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0145.html
          http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0027.html
----
Issue 19.
Summary:  Re-revert min-size of flex items back to 'auto', with overflow consideration
From:     Elliot Sprehn
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0538.html
Analysis: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0456.html
Open
----
Issue 20.
Summary:  Min/max constraint sizing of flexible flex-basis: 0.
From:     Tab Aktins
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0342.html
Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0511.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0463.html
Open
----
Issue 21.
Summary:  Clarify interaction of table fixup and flex itemizing
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0508.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0462.html
Open
----
Issue 22.
Summary:  Re-evaluate static position of flex items and grid items
From:     dholbert and fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0514.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0459.html
Note:     This can probably be left open during LC, since no one is
          necessarily proposing a change to static pos in Flexbox,
          just need to ensure alignment with Grid.
Open
----