-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 790
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-cr-2013.txt
More file actions
331 lines (329 loc) · 14.3 KB
/
issues-cr-2013.txt
File metadata and controls
331 lines (329 loc) · 14.3 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-css-text-decor-3-20130801/
Title: CSS Text Decoration Level 3
Figure out situation for https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0082.html ?
----
Issue 1.
Summary: Allow UA to skip ink by default
From: Edward O'Connor
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/m2iositu9t.fsf@eoconnor.apple.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0088.html
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727#issuecomment-337748467
Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/776c8197d091/css-text-decor/Overview.bs
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0069.html
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727#issuecomment-338185006
----
Issue 2.
Summary: text-decoration-color doesn't handle SVG fills
From: Tavmjong Bah
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/1400592192.22096.52.camel@localhost.localdomain
Response:
Closed: Deferred to FXTF Paint
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 3.
Summary: Allow specifying position and thickness of underlines
From: Lea Verou
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/9500A3A5-957D-462D-B30C-E5C548ADEB0E@verou.me
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/53BE565D.5090905@inkedblade.net
Closed: Deferred to L4
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
----
Issue 4.
Summary: Allow arbitrary decorations
From: Sebastian Zartner
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAERejNbMCrZiBbCSRjA_1mZ3qOZyQ9PTDoH+TxvX4gp_2eSnpg@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDB-xMb46nMf3piNNU_fcyry0hUoKh=WfPmZma3CA=c8Gg@mail.gmail.com
Closed: Rejected
Note: Proposal is way ahead of its time; use cases may be addressed in
future specs, unknown as yet which ones.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
----
Issue 5.
Summary: text-shadow should apply to inline images
From: Axel Dahmen
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/maatmk$bq8$1@ger.gmane.org
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0087.html
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
----
Issue 6.
Summary: Don't underline leading/trailing spaces
From: Florian Rivoal
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/3A25BF98-130D-43F1-A883-90EAC8EDECB5@rivoal.net
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u5pTm7eTDQ-skjhfMA6nfHSewvnrtoYOxXVSj22HxXKw@mail.gmail.com
Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/dad5fcc900d7/css-text-decor/Overview.bs
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u5pTm7eTDQ-skjhfMA6nfHSewvnrtoYOxXVSj22HxXKw@mail.gmail.com
Verified: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u5pTm7eTDQ-skjhfMA6nfHSewvnrtoYOxXVSj22HxXKw@mail.gmail.com
----
Issue 7.
Summary: Error in computed value of 'text-shadow'
From: David Baron
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/20150326151542.GA19304@pescadero.dbaron.org
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDB9UDyk+8v53t5kDjcTsJZJ0E8BFa5RPn3nYqh1=0VgtA@mail.gmail.com
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/fe04a357105875cf26b30bf9375c8b310a517524
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 8.
Summary: s/above/outside/ for emphasis marks
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698Cn7Yg5+bQO8NN1YrnpZak_yXQVYRc8HUQB3OB0_x9RA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/E1CA333C-15C7-44F5-BDA1-23BBF16E5DE5@gmail.com
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9432fa2c1e8e80418bcd30538a739854d39a7bd
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 9.
Summary: Clarify position of emphasis marks over auto-hidden ruby
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0193.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0230.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0116.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0020.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0036.html
Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/cbcdad5472a0
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: =WG= Resolve.
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0037.html
----
Issue 10.
Summary: Clarify whether emphasis marks are upright or sideways for sideways-rl/lr
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0285.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0089.html
Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/d895ae89479b/css-text-decor/Overview.bs
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary: UA rules for text-emphasis-position should handle Japanese within Chinese
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0311.html
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/5654DED1.8070706@inkedblade.net
Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/51a999522cc2
Closed: Accepted =i18n= Review
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
----
Issue 12.
Summary: Are there emphasis mark position preferences for Korean?
From: fantasai
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/5654DED1.8070706@inkedblade.net
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/klreq/issues/20
Response: https://github.com/w3c/klreq/issues/20#issuecomment-337779644
Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/22c74858f801
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 13.
Summary: Should emphasis marks use 'font-variant: ruby'?
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq69_efU_tobZe8VDYfM9qCm0ejpiajmmys5JW4h8=oAx4Lg@mail.gmail.com
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0094.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0111.html
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/22ed0ceb4192652bcee96c139326acb742b1d868
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/aa9ae9847dcff26d80f2b4d097e0f13781f25a44
----
Issue 14.
Summary: 'text-emphasis' shorthand should not allow only <color>
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq699grzUvrZHMHW17bFCE-CamQmfeGgOHN-tB4ViKsWtqTA@mail.gmail.com
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq699ztveczAWh1nYZekBoNFUKVz2LCiUUigUSuxV+CuT6HA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0355.html
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
Verified: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-10-18/#e893598
----
Issue 15.
Summary: Emphasis marks per typographic character unit
From: Richard Ishida
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/5652E04D.6080408@w3.org
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0084.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 16.
Summary: Emphasis marks shouldn't apply to punctuation
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq699v=qhkpXD8smpV0TSOW_GEt67Z4HZWmTheqhv2n+=ekw@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0083.html
Followup: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/839
Open: =i18n= Discuss.
----
Issue 17.
Summary: 'text-emphasis-position' requires too many arguments
From: Momdo Nakamura
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/20151215203411.4682.EDA4FE4B@gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0118.html
Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/49463814bb5b/css-text-decor/Overview.bs
Open: Accepted =i18n= Verify assumptions in proposal.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
----
Issue 18.
Summary: 'text-underline-position' should default to 'auto' for CJK, to avoid compat issues
From: Masayuki Nakano
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/55506D67.7060308@d-toybox.com
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/5C756B1C-F03B-4CA7-8796-7A6EEBC34C32@apple.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0144.html
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c7ca2e5cf82ddb73a8e58484eeee21750fd32d2
8000
e
https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/6b29859a1ce2/css-text-decor/Overview.bs
Open: Accepted =i18n= Evaluate whether defaulting omitted auto/under to auto is better than under.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
----
Issue 19.
Summary: 'text-underline-position' UA rules don't handle non-CJK inside CJK
From: Myles Maxfield
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0210.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0092.html
Changes: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0094.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
----
Issue 20.
Summary: Module needs update to handle new sideways-lr/sideways-rl writing modes
From: fantasai
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/56E86D82.10606@inkedblade.net
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0119.html
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/aa9ae9847dcff26d80f2b4d097e0f13781f25a44
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: =WG= =i18n= Review.
----
Issue 21.
Summary: Specify interaction of text-decoration, text-emphasis, and ruby
From: Momdo Nakamura
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698GTMUd=OBrgaFLcNYWhMdmOtaYa6D-8OrGSbxZZDaibw@mail.gmail.com
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/160
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f205ff9dc6b969d015aa37c710b32d3845f137c9
Open: Accepted =i18n= Review.
Resolved: =WG= Review.
----
Issue 22.
Summary: CJK vs. skipping ink
From: Koji Ishii
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/707
Closed: Deferred
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
----
Issue 23.
Summary: ???
From: Christoph Päper
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/799
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/799#issuecomment-290461207
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 24.
Summary: line-throughs vs. skipping ink
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/711
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/711#issuecomment-268594411
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6d37258d4696972886a18f2298488cf94800060a
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3vcLHbfAhsZi8OCT+kuQOuxt_qH4rimVTewkvNR=SUi=Q@mail.gmail.com
----
Issue 25.
Summary: Position of underline should depend on skipped things
From: Dave Hyatt
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/3ADFB47B-FE63-4820-A602-D3BABFF6126F@apple.com
Closed: Deferred
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
----
Issue 26.
Summary: text-decoration-skip should have keyword for complex initial value
From: Florian Rivoal
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/843
Closed: Deferred
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html
----
Issue 27.
Summary: underline-becoming-line-through note is confusing
From: Hiroshi Sakakibara
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/160#issuecomment-224203512
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/160#issuecomment-269328826
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0ff76a5ed7ce0e6de7c17ec4b7a357f56fcab3f0
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 28.
Summary: Initial value of text-shadow should be 'currentColor'
From: Jonathan Kew
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/942
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/942#issuecomment-281751272
Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/22897f99b2ac/css-text-decor/Overview.bs
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0088.html
----
Issue 29.
Summary: 'text-underline-position: under' using font metrics conflicts with Arabic/Tibetan
From: Richard Ishida
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1055
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1055#issuecomment-337752816
Open: =i18n= Suggest next actions, if any.
----
Issue 30.
Summary: ink skipping should conform to glyph shapes
From: Toby Reif
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1093
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1093#issuecomment-340963541
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/904e554cc193e11ff9338f7d1a3fa0995821dcd7
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0044.html
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1093#issuecomment-339621321
----
Issue 31.
Summary: interaction of 'display: contents' and text-decoration
From: Loirooriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136
Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/b695de85d22b
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 32.
Summary: Text decoration shouldn't skip Ethiopic word space
From: Richard Ishida
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1146
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1146#issuecomment-337783678
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 33.
Summary: Cross-reference 'text-underline-position' from 'text-decoration-line'
From: Richard Ishida
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1178
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1178#issuecomment-337790860
Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/7baf02b2c7e3
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 34.
Summary: Questions about `text-emphasis-position`
From: Richard Ishida
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1207
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1207#issuecomment-337791679
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 35.
Summary: text-shadow canonical order doesn't match impls
From: Anthony Ramine
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1485
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1485#issuecomment-318728810
Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/5683d7ffe07b
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 36.
Summary: List Mongolian as `text-underline-position: under right`
From: Koji Ishii
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0405.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: =i18n= Review
----
Issue 37.
Summary: Describe text-decoration-style before -color.
From: Dennis Heuer
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0066.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----