csswg-drafts/css-flexbox/issues-lc-2012.txt at 23687ae93e773b92e5a6653550ea6da798453bcb · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted

Issue 0.
Summary:  Make spec understandable to authors
From:     Daniel Glazman
Comment:  at Hamburg F2F
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 1.
Summary:  min-width and min-height as auto in both axes?
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FD665E2.3000101@mozilla.com
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0696.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Handling replaced inlines as flex items
From:     CSSWG
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCWMOtPM1HUoo8wdA7nw1xSo3dnj0e3i50vq+eVh4txKw@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDfJ9_zFpRwf-2dbHhOByQ6QY8Lmszggga6c_-kFUM7Rg@mail.gmail.com
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  order property and accessibility
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FE24E10.4000501@inkedblade.net
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0046.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  order might be too generic of a name
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FBD8B99.4090101@inkedblade.net
Closed:   Rejected
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Paint flex items atomically?
From:     Morten Stenshorne
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/874npvizer.fsf@aeneas.oslo.osa
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0382.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0384.html
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Improve algorithm for hypothetical main size
From:     Alex Mogilevsky
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/2C86A15F63CD734EB1D846A0BA4E0FC823CBFC16@CH1PRD0310MB381.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
Response: [none required]
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Flexing prose is confusing
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FEC67B5.2060300@csail.mit.edu
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0700.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0383.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Handling <percentage> sizes in an indefinite-size container
From:     Sławomir Domagała
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0029.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0097.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Have align-items follow align-content by default
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0056.html
Response: [none needed]
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: [commenter is editor]
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  Flex-flow should affect default block-level alignment of flex container
          in place of containing block's 'direction'
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0072.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0077.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0095.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Aug/0003.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Clarifications to Chapter 4
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0078.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0094.html
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FF46774.6080404@csail.mit.edu
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0222.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  Use min-size instead of max-size for line breaking when size is auto
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0084.html
Response: [none needed]
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: [commenter is editor]
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  wrap-reverse is confusing
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FF46280.4080900@csail.mit.edu
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0161.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0173.html
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  visibility: collapse should redo line-breaking
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/4FF46931.30407@csail.mit.edu
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/4FF50153.8040801@inkedblade.net
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Aug/0003.html
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  sign error in algorithm
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wgy5uau14p7avi@localhost.localdomain
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0205.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  Should z-index Just Work on flex items?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0190.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 17.
Summary:  Does 'order' affect abspos placeholders?
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0167.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 18.
Summary:  Absolutely-positioned flex items should not affect layout in flex container
From:     John Hax
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0258.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0262.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0419.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 19.
Summary:  Flexbox needs examples with different writing modes
From:     i18nWG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0269.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0272.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0273.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0275.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 20.
Summary:  Baseline determination underdefined
From:     i18nWG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0271.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0274.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 21.
Summary:  Tables as flex items underdefined
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0385.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 22.
Summary:  Missing 'order' edit to <integer>
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/50096C12.3010908@mozilla.com
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0607.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 23.
Summary:  Accessibility comments on Flexbox
From:     PFWG
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2012JulSep/0049.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0281.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 24.
Summary:  Baseline alignment of inline-flex with overflow
From:     Morten Stenshorne
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0403.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0069.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0096.html
----
Issue 25.
Summary:  Awkward flex ratio terminology
From:     L. David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0356.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0116.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 26.
Summary:  Clarify parsing of unitless zero in 'flex' shorthand
From:     呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0216.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0300.html
Closed:   Accepted
----