-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 790
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-lc-20130718.txt
More file actions
198 lines (197 loc) · 7.7 KB
/
issues-lc-20130718.txt
File metadata and controls
198 lines (197 loc) · 7.7 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-counter-styles-3-20130718/
Title: CSS Counter Styles Level 3
Status: LCWD
----
Issue 1.
Summary: Hebrew should re-use the 1-100 digits for 1k-100k, separated by geresh.
From: Matitiahu Allouche
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0378.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0393.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 2.
Summary: Korean styles should have a negative indicator
From: MURAKAMI Shinyu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0229.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0705.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 3.
Summary: Spec says all Longhand CJK are negative-capable, but Korean isn't.
From: Richard Ishida
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/5213B4A4.5090706@w3.org
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0706.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 4.
Summary: Spec's description of longhand CJK styles is slightly clumsy.
From: Richard Ishida
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0376.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0707.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 5.
Summary: ethiopic-numeric step 5 is wrong.
From: Richard Ishida
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0375.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0714.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 6.
Summary: CJK examples for 10, 11, 100, and 101 were wrong for some languages.
From: Richard Ishida
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0374.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0737.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 7.
Summary: Treatment of cycles in 'speak-as' are undefined.
From: Reece Dunn
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0716.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0735.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 8.
Summary: Suffix for Korean styles should be an ASCII comma, not ideographic comma.
From: 신정식 (Jungshik SHIN)
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0292.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0742.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 9.
Summary: Fix location of Predefined Counter Styles document
From: Richard Ishida
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0747.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0007.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 10.
Summary: Step 5 in the CJK algorithm isn't needed.
From: MURAKAMI Shinyu
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0228.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0283.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0009.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0011.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary: Suggested changes to Chinese and Korean informal styles
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0101.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0102.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0605.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified:
----
Issue 12.
Summary: Behavior of setting CSSOM @counter-style attributes to invalid values is undefined
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0276.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0707.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 13.
Summary: Missing 'speak-as' descriptor from CSSOM API for @counter-style
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0197.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0201.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 14.
Summary: What should the OM for @counter-style return for unspecified descriptors?
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0324.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0532.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 15.
Summary: Loops in the 'system:override' aren't specified.
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0523.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0638.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 16.
Summary: 'pad' should only apply to some styles
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0520.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0531.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified:
----
Issue 17.
Summary: 'speak-as:auto' isn't handled correctly when 'system:override'.
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0628.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0636.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 18.
Summary: Definitions of 'hiragana', 'katakana', and their -iroha variants doesn't match implementations.
From: Richard Ishida
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0494.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0495.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0641.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 19.
Summary: 'pad' should count characters, not symbols.
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0549.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0550.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0643.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 20.
Summary: upper/lower-roman styles should max out at 3999
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0661.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0690.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 21.
Summary: speak-as loops should only "fix" styles actually participating in the loop
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0672.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0693.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 22.
Summary: 'symbolic' algorithm is wrong
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0664.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0695.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 23.
Summary: Spec is unclear about whether redefining the builtins affects built-in fallbacks.
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0653.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0689.html
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 24.
Summary: Referring to 'character' for length limits is ambiguous.
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0651.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0701.html
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 25.
Summary: 'alphabetic' and 'symbolic' systems should generate no repr for 0, rather than doing fallback
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0663.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0697.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0698.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0703.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0710.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified:
----
Issue 26.
Summary: 'cjk-decimal' style shouldn't be defined for negatives, as there's no common negative sign.
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0001.html
Response:
Closed: Accepted
----