-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 790
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-2011.txt
More file actions
279 lines (278 loc) · 12.7 KB
/
issues-2011.txt
File metadata and controls
279 lines (278 loc) · 12.7 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-css3-multicol-20110412
Title: CSS Multi-column Layout Module Level 1
----
Issue 1.
Summary: allow percentages for `column-gap`
From: Chris Harvey
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1321
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0572.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1321#issuecomment-298845182
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1321#issuecomment-300548136
----
Issue 2.
Summary: definition of `column-span` should say what happens without an ancestor multicol
From: David Baron
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1074
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1074#issuecomment-289172502
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1074#issuecomment-289882650
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1074#issuecomment-290106054
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0018.html
----
Issue 3.
Summary: definition of `column-span: all` repeats itself
From: David Baron
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1073
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 4.
Summary: Does 'column-span' work on tables?
From: David Baron
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1071
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1071#issuecomment-284115806
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1071#issuecomment-284139730
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1071#issuecomment-284532508
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1071#issuecomment-287919103
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1071#issuecomment-289877175
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1071#issuecomment-290150304
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0088.html<Paste>
----
Issue 5.
Summary: minimum and preferred width of multicol is not defined
From: François Remy
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/420
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/420#issuecomment-253261529
Closed: Invalid
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/420#issuecomment-253434545
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Oct/0091.html
----
Issue 6.
Summary: Clarify that column-* properties only apply to block containers
From: Sebastian Zartner
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1364
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1364#issuecomment-310139377
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0028.html
----
Issue 7.
Summary: Clipping of content that overflows a column
From: Chris Rebert
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/314
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/314#issuecomment-232662653
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/314#issuecomment-233462863
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/314#issuecomment-263801631
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/314#issuecomment-287126356
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/314#issuecomment-310138645
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0028.html
----
Issue 8.
Summary: Remove concept of available width and have pseudo-algorithm depend on used width
From: Simon Sapin
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0484.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0226.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0347.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0471.html
----
Issue 9.
Summary: References to Paged Media
From: David Baron
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0043.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0046.html
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1746
Open
----
Issue 10.
Summary: Intrinsic Sizing of Multicol Elements
From Fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0333.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0344.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0346.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0478.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0482.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0483.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0487.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0505.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0526.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0008.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0009.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0010.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0225.html
Open
----
Issue 11.
Summary: Should margins collapse on spanning elements
From: Håkon Wium Lie
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Sep/0509.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Oct/0591.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Nov/0480.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Nov/0540.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Nov/0698.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Nov/0701.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Nov/0734.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Dec/0109.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Dec/0262.html
----
Issue 12.
Summary: Column rule drawing order
From: Peter Salas
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0251.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0363.html
----
Issue 13.
Summary: Text describing column boxes as block container boxes
From: Anton Prowse
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Dec/0058.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0392.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0338.html
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1738
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1738#issuecomment-342661881
----
Issue 14.
Summary: z-index and pseudo stacking contexts, column rules are painted in the inline content layer
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0546.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0363.html
----
Issue 15.
Summary: z-order of column rule and column scrolling
From: Morten Stenshorne
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0777.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0006.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0777.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0241.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0242.html
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1739
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1739#issuecomment-342659978
----
Issue 16.
Summary: Remove Example XVII in CR
From: Gérard Talbot
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0498.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0507.html
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1740
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1740#issuecomment-342662336
----
Issue 17.
Summary: Contradictions about whether zero is allowed for 'column-width'
From: David Baron
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011May/0338.html
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1741
Open
----
Issue 18.
Summary: Changed "Content in the normal flow" to "Floated or in-flow content"
From: Håkon Wium Lie
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0253.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 19.
Summary: Revised pseudo-algorithm
From: Bert Bos
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0347.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/att-0225/tmp.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0253.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0629.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0471.html
----
Issue 20.
Summary: Properties columns, column-width, column-count "apply to block containers"
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0536.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 21.
From: Gérard Talbot
Summary: margin collapsing between column-spanning element and blocks in column boxes
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0356.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0
7FA4
510.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0247.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 22.
From: Philippe Verdy
Summary: break-* properties and non-paged media; "break-fill" property proposal for child elements
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0027.html
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1743
Open
----
Issue 23.
From: Robert O'Callahan
Summary: Remove the restriction about overflow columns only being in continuous media in the statement that column-fill has no effect on overflow columns
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Dec/0455.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0274.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0304.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0471.html
----
Issue 24.
Summary: Have two keywords for balancing - "balance" and either "balance-last" or "balance-all", depending on what implementations (including Prince and AH) do by default.
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0471.html
----
Issue 25.
Summary: To balance columns, you just make the row as short as possible (honoring breaking controls, sizes, etc.), then flow normally into that height. No explicit "balancing" occurs (but it's a common effect).
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0471.html
----
Issue 26.
From: Håkon Wium Lie
Summary: Can overflow content influence column height?
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0396.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0397.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0423.html
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1745
Open
----
Issue 27.
From: Virgil Palanciuc
Summary: Inconsistency with definition of column-rule-width
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0416.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0550.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 28.
From: James Holderness
Summary: Columns do not clip anything. (As if ::column just had overflow:visible by default.)
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0057.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0269.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0471.html
----
Issue 29.
From: Rachel Andrew
Summary: Should reference to breaking values be removed from the introduction?
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1966
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1966#issuecomment-343537878
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 30.
From: Rachel Andrew
Summary: Referring to the multicol element or container
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1965
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1965#issuecomment-343698710
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1965#issuecomment-346424523
----
Issue 31.
From: Dennis Heuer
Summary: outline-width and outline-style are poorly designed
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0040.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0047.html
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: Editors' discretion