csswg-drafts/css-values-3/issues-cr-2016.bsi at 5a78df7061114a5e02c60b9673730fb705e38efa · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
Draft:    https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-values-3-20160929/
Title:    CSS Values and Units Level 3

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Drop 3-component syntax from <position> for disambiguation
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0052.html
Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/90dad9ebbc6a/css-values-3/Overview.bs
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0003.html
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0052.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  # multiplier is confused with *
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/381
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/381#issuecomment-301952385
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Add comma-optional list notation
From:     Jarek Foksa
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/385
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/385#issuecomment-243825038
Closed:   Rejected in favor of [ foo+ ]# which is functionally equivalent
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0000.html
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  When to clamp negative calc() when negative lengths not allowed
From:     Emilio
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/434
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/434#issuecomment-362787638
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f50df1824c8cfed895a63fb3b30baa0d73327a90
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Dec/0018.html
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Ambiguous parsing of zero in <integer> | <length>
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/489
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/b6b1b24b6cf0440adafd78ff5b9f1b65ecd26d7c
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Duplicate References
From:     Momdo
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/559
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/559#issuecomment-314914033
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Switch [...]! multiplier to ?? combinator
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/687
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/687#issuecomment-310175183
Closed:   Retracted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/687#event-1133504923
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Categorize high-res screens with low-res screens, not print.
From:     Patrick Lauke
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708#issuecomment-260529072
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0085.html
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Undefined value of rem when no root element
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/936
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/936#issuecomment-290571695
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  url() missing from index
From:     Praveeen Puglia
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1014
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f7f942e9672b199892ba76e7bad9d8242f389f4f
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Clarify interpretation of 0 inside calc()
From:     Michael Giuffrida
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1114
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1114#issuecomment-287236248
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/1024dc3fcd3ea9c8fb45dbec7406a6c80117b0d5
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  calc() divisors should support numeric expressions
From:     Anthony Ramine
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1241
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1241#issuecomment-294843757
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Was change intentional for print media with unusual viewing distances?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708#issuecomment-302240095
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708#issuecomment-303779713
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708#issuecomment-312419658
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  Restrict unitless 0 for angles to specific functions that need it
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0027.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0027.html
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  Consideration of scrollbars in viewport unit computation not implemented
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1766
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0014.html
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  CSS2 and css-values conflict on empty url()s
From:     Geoffrey Sneddon
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2211
Open
----