-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 791
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-wd-2017.bsi
More file actions
502 lines (500 loc) · 18.8 KB
/
issues-wd-2017.bsi
File metadata and controls
502 lines (500 loc) · 18.8 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
Draft: hhttps://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-display-3-20151015/
Title: CSS Display Module Level 3
Note: There were also issues on box-suppress, but it has been deferred to a future level to enable further work.
----
Issue 1.
Summary: table-caption & table-cell should use flow-root not flow
From: Oriol
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0372.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0064.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary: Define <br> and <wbr>
From: Ian Hickson, Tab Atkins
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0155.html
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610#issuecomment-274911199
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0065.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0066.html
Closed: Deferred to HTML https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2291
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
----
Issue 3.
Summary: Shouldn't root be in-flow?
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0332.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
----
Issue 5.
Summary: Interaction of run-in and ::first-letter
From: Florian Rivoal
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0330.html
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650#issuecomment-274908554
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
----
Issue 6.
Summary: Inconsistent implementation of 'display: flex' on <fieldset>
From: glanbin
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321#issuecomment-232788709
Closed: Invalid
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 7.
Summary: Consider removing 'display: run-in'
From: Ms2ger
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339#issuecomment-234783783
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
-----
Issue 8.
Summary: Define interaction of 'display: contents' and replaced elements
From: Simon Pieters
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540#issuecomment-285214950
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sQbKYcM6mmRueGJBozPGer_UwQDMyv+eww3kOBAHC7mg@mail.gmail.com
-----
Issue 9.
Summary: Display value visible to AT
From: Dave Cramer, Sara Soueidan
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560#issuecomment-270094051
Closed: OutOfScope
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 10.
Summary: Effect of 'display: contents' on counter scoping
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/674
Response:
Closed: Accepted
Note: Still needs edits in css-lists-3.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary: Why is introduction normative? Also defining “element”?
From: Anne van Kesteren
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680#issuecomment-270103941
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 12.
Summary: 'display: contents' on root element
From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805#issuecomment-266991346
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 13.
Summary: “run-in box with 'display: flow'” nonsensical
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832#issuecomment-270106512
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 14.
Summary: "flow-root" harmful
From: Binyammin Laukstein
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275141140
Closed: Invalid
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275208753
----
Issue 15.
Summary: Rename flow-root
From: Simon Fraser
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964#issuecomment-274638719
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com
Verified: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com
----
Issue 16.
Summary: Tooltips are wrong
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834#issuecomment-280431244
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 17.
Summary: HTML shouldn't be a normative reference
From: Bert Bos
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011#issuecomment-286501361
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 18.
Summary: What are form controls?
From: Boris Zbarsky
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024#issuecomment-285215276
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 19.
Summary: Anonymous boxes inheriting from `display: contents`
From: Oriol, Boris Zbarsky
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1249
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301942276
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301953751
----
Issue 20.
Summary: Propagation of text-decoration applied to `display: contents`
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136#issuecomment-301938274
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9a8bdda32c4d22a2cbc98d6c3724b72f651b6b3
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html
----
Issue 21.
Summary: `display: block` seems to define flex and grid items as block-level
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292656095
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292738919
Response:
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 22.
Summary: Display erroneously groups ruby with atomic inlines
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180#issuecomment-292638199
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 23.
Summary: Block containers can also establish an inline formatting context
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301622704
Cloed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301630234
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-314583112
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 24.
Summary: Revisions to *-level definitions
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294637052
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294646968
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-301623329
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 25.
Summary: Do table captions participate in BFC or TFC?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189#issuecomment-301626461
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 26.
Summary: Table contins invalid values
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225#issuecomment-301631015
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 27.
Summary: list-item definition implies invalid keyword combos are valid
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226#issuecomment-301631288
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 28.
Summary: Do contents and none have outer display type?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227#issuecomment-301631748
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 29.
Summary: Run-in erroneously excludes blocks that establish inline formatting context
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228#issuecomment-301632605
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2f6354014360662e2aef0e25da433852d4fa8b3a
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 30.
Summary: Blockification rules not backwards-compatible for inline-block
From: Boris Zbarsky
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-301634850
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-305246779
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-313211986
Open: =WG= Discuss.
----
Issue 31.
Summary: Rename “block container” to “flow container”
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301635795
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301639507
----
Issue 32.
Summary: Text nodes vs text runs
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281#issuecomment-301942809
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html
----
Issue 33.
Summary: Inheritance with 'display: contents' and ::first-line
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310
Response:
Open
----
Issue 34.
Summary: Define 'display: contents' as a type of box
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299120942
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299247618
Closed: Retracted
----
Issue 35.
Summary: Define more sensible blockification for layout-internal types
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340#issuecomment-301641681
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5aaca4a7030e818cd02ac2d93137e1cd1d295bae
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 36.
Summary: Inlinification, recursion, and ruby vs display definitions
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301643296
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301944521
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-313204672
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html
----
Issue 37.
Summary: Does display: contents apply to ::before ::after
From: Emilio
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345#issuecomment-313205067
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html
----
Issue 38.
Summary: Define interaction of various box tree fixups
From: Boris Zbarsky
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301878155
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301888405
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302250667
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302748058
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f5b79e99bb8fc9ebea4ed956ed3420bc69b90786
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 39.
Summary: Root inline box vs anonymous inline boxes
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301832460
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301833956
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301872204
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6aeeabe060c8d8c1397ef2196a4e3a62da964d5e
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 40.
Summary: Inlinification by display type or anon box fixup?
From: fantasai
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390#issuecomment-313211238
Closed: Retracted
----
Issue 41.
Summary: Computation of 'float' vs 'position' without a box
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436#issuecomment-313215820
Open
----
Issue 42.
Summary: Are run-in contents inside ::first-line?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313246128
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313249402
----
Issue 43.
Summary: “Becoming a formatting context” section is a mess
From: Oriol, fantasai
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457#issuecomment-313225448
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563
Open
----
Issue 44.
Summary: Is 'position: marker' out-of-flow?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458#issuecomment-313224602
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 45.
Summary: Does run-in algo recurse?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460#issuecomment-314593762
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c9f1bb16d0e5077b9bca7027a7d7252eeff5abf1
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 46.
Summary: Parallel construction should be pairwise disjoint (editorial)
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1470
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/09212af80e10e4e3e57965bb27b2de3fdcd86e06
Closed: Fixed
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 47.
Summary: BFC definition not quite right
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313240736
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313247457
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313263022
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313252408
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313266528
Open
----
Issue 48.
Summary: Run-in fixup vs block-in-inline fixup
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472#issuecomment-313242917
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 49.
Summary: Note wrt inheritance of ::first-line through 'display: contents'.
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473#issuecomment-313247421
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 50.
Summary: Display types: on elements or on boxes?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314569164
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314583675
----
Issue 51.
Summary: Should 'inline-foo' and 'inline foo' be distinct?
From: David Baron
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486
Open
----
Issue 52.
Summary: At-risk list omits three-component values
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1490
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/394c62f72fda4ac824c9ce204a99bf991b9e6471
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 53.
Summary: Discrepencies in run-in
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491#issuecomment-314570280
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 54.
Summary: Serialization of list-item values not listed
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493#issuecomment-314572350
Closed: OutOfScope (to CSSOM) / Rejected (for editorial)
Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial
----
Issue 55.
Summary: Missing definition of 'inline-list-item'
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495#issuecomment-306282449
Open
----
Issue 56.
Summary: Redesign 'flow-root' keyword and related features
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496
Open
----
Issue 57.
Summary: Inlinification doesn't inlinify layout-internal boxes
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582
Response:
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 58.
Summary: <legend> with no box example is confusing
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494427
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494885
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313498359
Open
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 59.
Summary: Blocks that contain only inlines, establishing BFC+IFC?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553
Open
----
Issue 60.
Summary: Define establishing a BFC as a flow-root only thing via used values
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550
Open
----