csswg-drafts/css-contain-1/issues-2017.txt at 83d38d5991b5d7e3bea94d509a19f8958510a4ad · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
Draft:    https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-contain-1-20170221/
Title:    CSS Contain Level 1

Comment: As the publication of the FPWD of this specification was siginificantly delayed
compared to when the group agreed to publish, this disposition of comments
goes back further in time than the actual publication as an FWPD.

Comments about the very early Editor Drafts are not included as they are more
of a collaborative design phase than reviews, but comments there after are included.

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  layout containment should make an element containing block for absolute/fixed positioned elements
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/404#issue-170956476
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/404#issuecomment-295148939
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/404#issuecomment-295148939
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Unclear what contain:size does for replaced elements
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/382#issue-169478944
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/382#issuecomment-295148501
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/382#issuecomment-295148501<Paste>
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  We may want size containement in 1d
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1031#issue-207386839
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1031#issuecomment-295152488
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1031#issuecomment-295152488
----
Issue 4.
9B26
Summary:  Make It easier to use contain: size in cases where the size is unknown
From:     bmaurer
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issue-208209686
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issuecomment-281277097
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issuecomment-295157661
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issuecomment-300306823
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Use proper HTML in markup example
From:     Thierry Koblentz
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1058#issue-209813058
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1058#issuecomment-282089800
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1058#issuecomment-282330942
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Clarify ambiguous phrasing
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/830#issue-197360152
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Reuse "ink overflow" terminology
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/396#issue-170423394
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Layout containment and overflow
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0314.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3vDKAKWCeUgPGC_T2BCSBCq1byCOJfzVfX8i+BbYqOC1Q@mail.gmail.com
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Splitting the "sizing" part from "layout" containment
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDBe5Qq7Xb3Cxi6ee4y4b6FxbwYM_mxinvhjpkdWKFAiqw@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCa-LHxVFGACoGav19wWztQg_GRDmS8fEf=EJaF_B0now@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/AEA060EC-7235-4C90-97BE-CBC317229714@rivoal.net
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0384.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  Remove dependency of paint containment on overflow clip
From:     leviw
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sME1oBdWnJ-kQikH0jGLC6xYamWr3qvsa6FurQLLeb_A@mail.gmail.com
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sME1oBdWnJ-kQikH0jGLC6xYamWr3qvsa6FurQLLeb_A@mail.gmail.com
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Overflow when layout containment is on should be ink overflow
From:     Florian Rvoal
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/86302BF1-1488-4E69-8529-3332B5A0BB9A@rivoal.net
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3t4RuTWnQr_dDtd18zQEBYRzfi0P35R_HACZGyPmbwVTA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/02e25a3f48bd0cd1be349513a024d71891d64de0
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  The 'contain' property doesn't work well with regions
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/EF27E698-1B0A-47DB-ACF1-DACE59126A03@rivoal.net
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/D1B9B001.29FD3%25stearns@adobe.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/2A0F0B36-6765-475D-85D9-0AE7DDE6EB94@rivoal.net
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDA+4yz2952hHaf576B6rZdanJsYOQVn5Cg6zgZtd9REdw@mail.gmail.com
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Clarify interation with display content
From:     Kyle Zentner
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CA+h3cCpKxWD=nXedcoFUffg=7+Lk0U=PjH4uVpxdNOePYiwjRg@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/31FDCD6A-7CAE-4984-9FE4-C3D580CAB49B@rivoal.net
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-04-19/#e798577
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  Clarify interation with table parts
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/55BA836C.6060404@mozilla.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/B10ABC55-830F-46E7-88E5-5659F4E5E926@rivoal.net
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCxm8F+rQaUzQa47F-H=6W_peyTsZctOYV9a4ZHRUj4hA@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDBQ7XCcO69pMn7V6F8DasjMfMWEuof2UTTXOJo9Uf0aZA@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/A904B03A-4B63-480F-842E-F4290CD1AACE@rivoal.net
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-04-21/#e800809
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  Typo
From:     Chris Rebert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1255
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  Be more specific about security risks
From:     Ralf Swick
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1376
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial