-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 790
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-wd-2013.txt
More file actions
533 lines (527 loc) · 20.3 KB
/
issues-wd-2013.txt
File metadata and controls
533 lines (527 loc) · 20.3 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-transforms-1-20131126/
Title: CSS Transforms Level 1
Dates: 2012/05/01 through 2016/12/29
2D Transforms Only (3D Transforms move to L2 per WG resolution)
Unfiled threads:
* Someone figure out if thread at https://www.w3.org/mid/F1CB6513-BAD8-4CCA-8658-194EDEB7C2C8@andrewdupont.net concluded?
- spec already says that transforms affect getBoundingClientRect.
* Ditto http://www.w3.org/mid/510806D8.5050403@w3.org
- this is addressed by the GeometryUtils interface: https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#the-geometryutils-interface
* Make sure https://www.w3.org/mid/B7126E1C-EB7C-4D9F-9238-F9CDD72BDB21@adobe.com doesn't affect 2D else file it herein.
- filed https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/907
* Is http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGN7qDBomdt1QFyM_VsydiY=Vo-PcyX9T7ZSHb8raEA=-Vfvjg@mail.gmail.com filed somewhere?
- seems like an implementor issue?
Issues are thematically sorted.
Recommend to start with will-change issue, then start at the top and work down.
F2F notes with resolutions: https://www.w3.org/2017/01/11-fx-irc https://www.w3.org/2017/01/12-fx-irc
Note: all open issues have been moved to github. Updated spec link to point there.
----
Issue 1.
Summary: Issues list link is outdated
From: Rick Byers
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/486
Response:
Open: =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 2.
Summary: Add more info to “Module Interactions”
From: Dirk Schulze
Comment: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17237
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/914
Open: =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 3.
Summary: Convert to <*-percentage> notation
From: Sebastian Zartner (SebastianZ)
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/645
Open: =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Editorial.
----
Issue 4.
Summary: Define transform list using grammar
From: Sebastian Zartner
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAERejNZgyWKV5ioh3KR9BmYYrvpM5919D9z1Qb-LjQ5zBGOFuQ@mail.gmail.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCB7nP+rqj7DzAef6zqMHtvoshLGMJuL7PsMi-V9qvPfw@mail.gmail.com
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 5.
Summary: Clarify matrix index convention
From: Maurizio Casimirri
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/C73D086A-A220-48E3-A3DC-6195D350C3FA@gmail.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/924
Open: =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 6.
Summary: Confusion about multiplication
From: Simon Sapin & Boris Zbarsky
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/509FCC62.5080101@mit.edu
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/909
Open: =ED= Make sure comments in thread are all addressed
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 7.
Summary: Application of transform to inlines
From: Gérard Talbot
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/b464220dd959f9a9f808dd4aad85288e@gtalbot.org
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/20140210195906.GA18205@crum.dbaron.org
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/908
Open: =WG= Editorial.
Resolved:
----
Issue 8.
Summary: Computed Style of 'transform'
From: Dirk Schulze
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/A020C5AD-51B0-4288-8D8A-9D8322213D5B@adobe.com
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/20140325212945.GA26872@crum.dbaron.org
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/314879EA-CF63-4792-90DD-36000224B04F@adobe.com
Open: =ED= Fixed
Resolved: Bugfix
Verified: [need a response where dbaron says it's all good now]
----
Issue 9.
Summary: Error in order of multiple transform function
From: rosenau
Comment: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29110
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/909.
Open: =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 10.
Summary: Clarify behavior for gradientTransform and patternTransform
From: Erik Dahlström
Comment: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/919
Open: =Dirk= Deal. or =WG= Discuss.
----
Issue 11.
Summary: Use of “containing block” does not match CSS2.1 definition
From: Aryeh Gregor
From: Simon Sapin
Comment: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16328
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/514E058C.5060105@exyr.org
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/913
Notes: See also dbaron's message in the issue below.
Open: =ED= Figure out what to do. https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/913
Resolved: Editor discretion (or agenda+ if there's a problem)
----
Issue 12.
Summary: Spec doesn't mention establishing abspos containing block
From: Robert O'Callahan
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/24BE3FE7-60C9-4690-A01C-F2291460DE7F@adobe.com
From: David Baron
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/20151125002414.GA22745@pescadero.dbaron.org
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/919
Open: =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 13.
Summary: Interaction of regions and transforms and abspos/fixedpos
From: Mihnea-Vlad Ovidenie
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CE4E28E9.4B01C%25mihnea@adobe.com
Response: =astearns= File against Regions
Closed: Out-of-Scope
----
Issue 14.
Summeray: Specify stack level of non-positioned transformed elements
From: Øyvind Stenhaug
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wg8psjr1bunlto@oyvinds-desktop
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/925
Changes:
Open: =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 15.
Summary: Clarify Appendix E rendering of 3D transformed descendants
From: David Baron
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/20150904234527.GA15137@pescadero.dbaron.org
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/926
Changes:
Open: =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 16.
Summary: transform functions should accept percentages
From: Boris Zbarsky
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/546F5D45.6030704@mit.edu
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/A2D81F68-B51F-468C-8C10-50D435980254@adobe.com
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 17.
Summary: Define basis for percentage transform on patterns, gradients, clipPath
From: Dirk Schulze
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/9B0DDCB4-B480-471F-943A-C5ED00598DFA@adobe.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/892
Open: =WG= Discuss.
----
Issue 18.
Summary: Match SVG spec for interaction with object bounding box units
From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds
Comment: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28385
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/922
Changes:
Open: =ED= Edit. https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/922
Resolved: Editor discretion.
----
Issue 19.
Summary: Update “transformable elements” for SVG2
From: Nikos Andronikos
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/358
Changes:
Open: =ED= Edit
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 20.
Summary: Units aren't back-compatible with old SVG
From: Dr. Olaf Hoffman
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/201204211629.13408.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/3DCACD7B-0115-44FC-901A-A86DC1211CD1@adobe.com
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 21.
Summary: Unitless values
From: Tab Atkins
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDDDMY0czypkLQ2X8tBtLFjYn5t9g+aYOPBzXLEAGzBzA@mail.gmail.com
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDD3VfCvDfe0TEUJEd7e+JXZzhRDGTyEgdc9Hodz0pCLUQ@mail.gmail.com
Open: =ED= Edit.
Resolved: =WG= Resolve.
----
Issue 22.
Summary: Transform syntax CSS vs SVG harmonization
From: Dirk Schulze
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/7E680372-9199-4AF9-98A1-C7B6ECB72C87@adobe.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/88568E75-27C9-4DA4-BCD6-7459FA5D9FE4@adobe.com
Open: Accepted
Resolved: =WG= Review.
----
Issue 23.
Summary: User coordinate space statement breaks SVG
From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAFDDJ7yhF7Qn28wVMqb7ra6N9Q=j74OTqHWpjLeYrH=LQwmd4A@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/893
Open: =WG= Discuss.
----
Issue 24.
Summary: Issues with transform on SVG root
From: Dirk Schulze
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/0A9D2705-9FFE-425B-B3CB-297EA97D337D@adobe.com
Open: =SVGWG= Figure out if anything remains to be done.
----
Issue 25.
Summary: Transforms on root SVG element
From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAFDDJ7xQp+j2c+18zkRyPWPtnuk+dbVA6Dc_L7ACr-tptAGicA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/894
Open: =WG= Discuss with SVG folks
----
Issue 26.
Summary: Use UA style sheet instead of prose for SVG transform-origin
From: Dirk Schulze
Comment: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28000
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/20150611085235.GA3929@wok.mcc.id.au
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CE3AFDB0-D260-493A-9110-16BB01D8E28E@adobe.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/920
Open: =ED= Edit.
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 27.
Summary: Specs disagree on whether transform-origin's resolved value is used or computed
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/392#issuecomment-238494067
Proposal: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/392#issuecomment-269639534
Response:
Changes:
Open: =WG= Discuss.
Resolved:
----
Issue 28.
Summary: transform-origin relative to containing block
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698_DMux4CFD6pA2MOdK7VX9yCWJgciXE0_MuRxXAV1WMA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698unKqMTgJpVXFmRtcmcjfwEkhGfmhhk0dsZgxiQ4E6uQ@mail.gmail.com
Closed: Retracted
----
Issue 29.
Summary: Add transform-origin-x/y?
From: Boris Zbarsky
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/50648288.4050309@mit.edu
Response:
Note: CSS Backgrounds L4 solved the logical coords problem since this thread was last discussed.
Open: =WG= Resolved.
Resolved:
----
Issue 30.
Summary: transform-origin: 0% not equivalent to 0px is confusing
From: Cameron McCormack
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/525F2287.8050002@mcc.id.au
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/895
Open: =WG= Discuss. (SVG)
Resolved:
----
Issue 31.
Summary: exact definition of origin argument to rotate()
From: Rik Cabanier
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGN7qDC=oAU5XQt0E7sJ=2vcMLU1BzmH4L7EzYsfvtL-5LbHZQ@mail.gmail.com
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKA+Axk=-C3tTdoKRU3g2Be=GV3aeiNfqYot3205h6fZVP2K=w@mail.gmail.com
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGN7qDD9LftfaCqnH_oPXe78GqYv2aOdE8forTWN515=-UHRmg@mail.gmail.com
Proposal: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGN7qDAw3eU72K-QSeMVmqPjh0_wihnBf7rG4bsVsQnfVSDJ5g@mail.gmail.com
Changes: [link to relevant section(s)]
Open: =ED= Needs edits?
Resolved: =WG= Resolved; no change (rotate with > 1 argument removed).
----
Issue 32.
Summary: Unitless zero rotation
From: Simon Fraser
Comment: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29413
Response:
Open: =ED= Update to reference CSS Values 3 correctly.
Resolved: [Sydney F2F 2016? need to find minutes]
----
Issue 33.
Summary: Make Rotation Less Weird in 3D transforms
From: Shane Stephens
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAGTfzwT8M0_c1Wnk5To1zRVtGXtuLzXbjkpDS55DC6T9dUTfKQ@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/896
Notes: See also zero-coord axis issue below.
Changes:
Open: =WG= Discuss.
Resolved:
----
Issue 34.
Summary: Reduce matrix decomposition when rotation axis has zero coord
From: Shane Stephens
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGTfzwTS9r+z1LRu=3t25NW0A6yk0b+agaH6__8ZkcSD3-LR9A@mail.gmail.com
Changes:
Open: =WG= Resolved: rotate(x,x,x,0) acts like the id() function relative to other rotate functions.
Resolved:
----
Issue 35.
Summary: Interpolation of transform lists
From: David Baron
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/20120719213826.GA8775@crum.dbaron.org
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/474B73CD-95F5-467B-9F39-90D7045E3A9C@adobe.com
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: ? (dbaron unhappy with the state of the spec regarding the matching of the perspective() function)
RESOLVED: Perspective will interpolate to perspective
Verified: [get verification from dbaron]
----
Issue 36.
Summary: Add null transform as placeholder for animations?
From: CSSWG
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/523AB5BE.50406@inkedblade.net
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/898
Response:
Open: =WG= RESOLVED: add id() transform function to transforms level 2, interpolates with anything
Resolved:
----
Issue 37.<
72A1
/div>
Summary: Smarter interpolation of truncated transform lists
From: Louis-Rémi Babé
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CALXxKfCKZd+P0mH2oFyDkBgps56WqwQnLSMpKk1nrqiFXScqVA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDBPafEbiXNy=Mw4a9w1jmvK6dUJzq28PPjN7APgtjqAEw@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/927
Changes:
Open: =WG= Discuss. Shane has action to collect frequency data.
Resolved:
----
Issue 38.
Summary: Transform interpolation problem
From: David Baron
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/20140702002134.GA26687@crum.dbaron.org
Response:
Changes:
Open: =WG= RESOLVED
Resolved: Transitions will run whenever the functions differ, even if the endpoints are functionally identical.
----
Issue 39.
Summary: Interpolated values don't interpolate well with original start/end
From: David Baron
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/20140226234818.GA5390@crum.dbaron.org
Changes:
Open: =WG= Resolved
Resolved: perpective() interpolates to perspective().
----
Issue 40.
Summary: Bugs in interpolation algorithm
From: Manish Goregaokar (Manishearth)
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/483#issuecomment-249497761
Response:
Changes:
Open: =ED= Edit or ask for help.
Resolved: Bugfix.
----
Issue 41.
Summary: Matrix Interpolation
From: Shane Stephens
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3tF-tBQMwhOWRAYN-L+rVPhX-_xAa6ynKGa57Ue4HMywA@mail.gmail.com
Notes: Might be further background elsewhere, didn't find it. But see below.
Response:
Changes:
Open: =WG= Reject.
Resolved:
----
Issue 42.
Summary: Use better matrix interpolation method
From: Ken Shoemake
From: Benoit Jacob
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/52CD882F.6020408@yahoo.com
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAJTmd9qXg+WAt5OK9g-pTEwHunEXxcKtvBSJ4fd_5=SmLHM-jg@mail.gmail.com
Response:
Open: =WG= RESOLVED: Respond that while this does look better, for web compat reasons we can't change, and we'll continue to push things that make it easier to avoid matrix interpolation.
Resolved:
----
Issue 43.
Summary: Matrix Decomposition
From: Dirk Schulze
From: Rik Cabanier
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/A54A72B2-5BFB-46F7-8B08-BE2B7A3EA8D2@adobe.com
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGN7qDBdtR1AWowudWzrj0ownknbvatv-HhC1E28_QJYSB47aQ@mail.gmail.com
Open: =WG= RESOLVED: Close issue 43 as invalid, now that all transforms decompose with a 4x4 matrix.s
Resolved:
----
Issue 44.
Summary: Include Tagaki-san's definition of linear scale
From: CSSWG
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sSRuNBNO8M_SUAp8BX7gnzCtBmmY9_bbm76xX2sU3N2g@mail.gmail.com
Open: =ED= Edit.
Resolved: RESOLVED: the scale described in issue 44 doesn't belong in the transform specification as it isn't used by CSS transforms - instead the fairly simple functions that describe how to extract a scale from a matrix should be described directly in SVG.
----
Issue 45.
Summary: getTransformToElement needs more detail
From: CSSWG
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3t+PxH+eCXcOxiX61J_Nx+jimkttsoViSCQNDSVOTKNDQ@mail.gmail.com
Response:
Changes:
Open: Move to geometry, and they should resolve to reject it.
Resolved:
----
Issue 46.
Summary: transform-box values & correspondance to SVG vs CSS
From: Erik Dahlström
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/op.x5otn9g7fwt8au@localhost.localdomain
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/928
Response:
Notes: See also https://drafts.fxtf.org/paint/#fill-origin
Open: =WG= Discuss, and ensure alignment with FXTF Paint.
Resolved:
----
Issue 47.
Summary: Scrollbars vs. scaling down
From: Tab Atkins
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDX2ECLHm523xNpr8qqYgsqeU2SXiY0GvZo7S1063CoAg@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOp6jLYZ8VMPW4wNOMkH_uLPROr1ows22AFgLqMuhzQ=h89m0A@mail.gmail.com
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDfy0ghxEB5jnSTP3LMTbGo1=p=Wq5GUizw3RySS6QGJA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOp6jLYTvsqEYfUv=mfayYADuJnZKhC1vakfdqsFvrPu0Tp_7A@mail.gmail.com
Closed: Invalid
Verified: =ED= Verify.
----
Issue 48.
Summary: Impact of transforms on scrollable area (multiple threads)
From: Robert O'Callahan
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAOp6jLbN9SjQd4zRy=BcswPxzOR5RHvvshjdQ7Xb7zfyG1V6KA@mail.gmail.com animation
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOp6jLZZrmwZ1xZG2AzF+VTzn+zFUFa0EpSXp1T-fSc7ZhNa7A@mail.gmail.com
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOp6jLbbe9PWKfiooQ-jT+0E=zAd9VRqD-XqqCNogvDVmiBxaQ@mail.gmail.com animation
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOMQ+w9LYiOQ3u=DagEKEMqSeV91RqCMnUgy5zCaZsJw0Fur7g@mail.gmail.com
Notes: See also https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow-3/#scrollable
Notes: See also https://www.w3.org/mid/56415511.5090604@mozilla.com
Open: =WG= Review discussions & request changes as necessary.
Resolved:
----
Issue 49.
Summary: Apply box-shadow after transform
From: Christian Mayer
Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/56C63DB8.8080004@ChristianMayer.de
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCGcu0S3DFeetReqfb6tV9J0eQay9M3tE=NeKSLTmL8Nw@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAFDDJ7wQ77_q23i3vJJmGubM6jBiCkbgR3QJcS6VRQk0H0C=kQ@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/C095D0EA-9473-4F5C-9E2A-8F7550F31A01@me.com
Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/56C7D1B2.4030700@inkedblade.net
Open: Rejected?
Resolved: =WG= Discuss.
----
Issue 50.
Summary: Some cubic-bezier functions output out of range [0,1]
From: hiikezoe
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/744
Response:
Open: =ED= Solve or agenda+.
Resolved:
----
Issue 51.
Summary: scale 0 on non-scaling stroke
From: Rik Cabanier
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGN7qDB29wTjx0KVOjpozGckXRevZ-JVkDnFTh1-+1v9FDkEiw@mail.gmail.com
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/201205121352.41569.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/929
Response:
Open: ?
Resolved: ?
----
Issue 52.
Summary: Some comments on the non-scaling stroke spec text
From: Dr. Olaf Hoffman
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/201205132051.25760.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/930
Open: =ED= Edit, file issues, or close as necessary.
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 53.
Summary: skew() is messed up
From: Dr. Olaf Hoffman
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/201203071410.51426.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/C4ADC064-7771-483F-AF81-79D6D54671B4@adobe.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/931
Open: =WG= Discuss.
----
Issue 54.
Summary: Rendering transforms with non-invertible matrix
From: Dr. Olaf Hoffman
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/201204221814.06054.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/930
Open: =ED= Figure out issue. =WG= Discuss & resolve.
----
Issue 55.
Summary: animateTransform thread of unclear conclusion
From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/201204261843.03940.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Continue: http://www.w3.org/mid/C3DB860D-28F2-4388-9D9E-513597FFAFE4@adobe.com
Open: =SVGWG= Figure out if this thread is 100% handled
Resolved:
----
Issue 56.
Summary: Deprecate animateTransform
From: Dr. Olaf Hoffman
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/86583EBE-30F0-41BD-B3E2-E6D5588BB821@adobe.com
Open: =SVGWG= Figure this out and respond to thread.
Resolved:
----
Issue 57.
Summary: Neutral element for addition wrt animating transforms
From: Dirk Schulze
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/24BE3FE7-60C9-4690-A01C-F2291460DE7F@adobe.com
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/932
Open: =WG=/=SVGWG= Discuss.
----
Issue 58.
Summary: Transforms vs background-attachment: fixed
From: Simon Fraser
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/42ED583F-AFF2-4D49-B20A-4335C93EEA23@me.com
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wgl87egg4p7avi@localhost.localdomain
Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKA+AxnmG8CynocjdOQR-6WrZDa-uGwGpO74KUMBo0W2x8waWA@mail.gmail.com
Notes: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15833
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/933
Response:
Open: =WG= Discuss.
----
Issue 59.
Summary: Use 'will-change' to optimize rasterization
From: chrishtr
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/236
Response:
Changes:
Open: =WG= Discuss.
Resolved:
----