-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 791
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-lc-2010.txt
More file actions
executable file
·60 lines (59 loc) · 2.52 KB
/
issues-lc-2010.txt
File metadata and controls
executable file
·60 lines (59 loc) · 2.52 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted
Issue 1.
Summary: Use term "inline style" somewhere to be consistent with HTML 4
From: Ingo Chao
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0507.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0187.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0196.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary: Specify inline styles' specificity
From: Ingo Chao
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0508.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0188.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0197.html
----
Issue 3.
Summary: Unclear that comment token convention is normative
From: SVGWG
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #2
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html
----
Issue 4.
Summary: Unclear that delimiting braces are excluded from style attribute syntax
From: SVGWG
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #4
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0473.html
Closed: Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0493.html
----
Issue 5.
Summary: CSS2.1 parsing rules exclude CSS3 properties
From: SVGWG
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #6
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html
Closed: OutOfScope // CSS2.1
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html
----
Issue 6.
Summary: CSS2.1 parsing rules exclude SVG properties
From: SVGWG
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #7
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html
Closed: Invalid // or OutOfScope -> CSS2.1?
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html
----
Issue 7.
Summary: Allow scientific notation in CSS properties
From: SVGWG
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0473.html
Closed: OutOfScope
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0493.html
-----