csswg-drafts/css-scroll-snap-1/issues-2015-12.txt at 951fc349f63ce196e3f9b4f4a0213db6e76b1f10 · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
Draft:    https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/
Title:    CSS Scroll Snapping Level 1
Shortname: css-scroll-snap

Issues since wrapping up the TPAC feedback in November.

Vague WG opinions at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0279.html

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Rename 'proximity' and 'mandatory'
From:     Sebastian Zartner
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0177.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0006.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0099.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified:
Resolved: TPAC 2016
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Add property to define poximity capture distance
From:     Sebastian Zartner
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0178.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0182.html
Closed:   Deferred
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0190.html
Resolved: Editor's discretion
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Split 'scroll-snap-type' into longhands
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0328.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0108.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0101.html
Response:
Closed:   Deferred
Verified: Reporter is editor
Resolved: Editor discretion due to apathy of the WG & lack of names
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Should tracking an element snap position be required?
From:     Matt Rakow
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0080.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0096.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: Reporter is editor
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0145.html
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Remove or maintain point-snapping
From:     Matt Rakow
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0177.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0096.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0102.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0103.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0105.html
Closed:   Deferred
Verified: Reporter is editor
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0353.html
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Viewport snap target area terminology
From:     Matt Rakow
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0080.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0096.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0096.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0000.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: Reporter is editor
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Logical alignment axis mismatches physical padding
From:     Matt Rakow
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0090.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0133.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0020.html
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0020.html
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Remove or maintain 'edges' value?
From:     Matt Rakow
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0090.html
Response: ?
Closed:   Deferred
Verified: Reporter is editor
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Rename scroll-snap-area to scroll-snap-margin
From:     fantasai  and Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0095.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: Reporter is editor
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0145.html
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  Need ability to skip content
From:     François Remy
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0142.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0146.html
Closed:   Invalid (already solved)
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0164.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Imprecise wording wrt out-of-range snap positions
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0191.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0091.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 12
Summary:  Renapping requirements wording
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0109.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0111.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0091.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0145.html
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Clarify behavior of scroll-snap-align on scroll container
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0192.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0212.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0227.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0095.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  Indirect scrolling
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0296.html #1
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0089.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0094.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  Hostile mandatory snapping conflicting with target
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0296.html #2
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0089.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: https://log.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2016-09-26/#e728994
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  Application to pseudo-elements
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0193.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0210.html
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/488
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/488#issuecomment-248139510
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/488#issuecomment-248239965
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0353.html
----
Issue 17.
Summary:  Extend scroll-snap-padding to handle related use cases
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0081.html
Response:
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/395
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/395#issuecomment-249653721
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: TPAC 2016
----
Issue 18.
Summary:  Reflow should result in maintaining snap position
From:     Scott Jehl
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/155
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/155#issuecomment-222843049
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 19.
Summary:  Add events for snapping
From:     Scott Jehl
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/156
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/156#issuecomment-249655183
Closed:   Deferred
----