csswg-drafts/css-flexbox/issues-lc-20140325.txt at 9bf839790c17a0c4afc1764ed7761e82abead9e8 · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
Draft:    http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-flexbox-1-20140325/
Title:    CSS Flexible Box Layout Module Level 1
Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Which size do percentage heights on flex items resolve against?
From:     Greg Whitworth
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0062.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0073.html
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editor's discretion
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Typos
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0090.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0091.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0100.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Excessive recalculation of free space
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0097.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0098.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0099.html
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Mishandling of zero free space
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0106.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0113.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Change 'flex' animatability to "yes, always"
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0169.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0175.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Use inline size for block-axis percentage padding
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0184.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0015.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0373.html
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Alternate wording for resolving flex lengths
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0223.html
Closed:   Retracted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0252.html
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Alternate wording for resolving flex lengths Take II
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0253.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0398.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0026.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0027.html
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0107.html
Note:     Current spec has both variants available for review.
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Better handling of max-height on flex containers
From:     Greg Whitworth
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0292.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0293.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0294.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0297.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0373.html
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  Regression in flex resolution algorithm
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0311.html
Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0397.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: (In IRC)
Resolved: Editor's discretion
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Missing negation in description of 'auto'
From:     Greg Whitworth
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0430.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0016.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  Clarify impact of alignment properties on abspos items
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0043.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0380.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Roughly resolved at WG discussion at Seoul F2F
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Make 'flex-basis: auto' compute through to main size property value
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0046.html
Note:     This was discussed earlier, see
          http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0029.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0192.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: WG member comment
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0056.html
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  Editorial comments
From:     Alan Stearns
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0057.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0195.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  Editorial simplification of flex distribution step
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0169.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0197.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  Min-height tweak to skip intrinsic aspect ratio items
From:     Greg Whitworth
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0177.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0011.html
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/53F3B6E3.50903@inkedblade.net
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 17.
Summary:  Typo
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0424.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0425.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 18.
Summary:  min-size: auto rules should be main-axis specific
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0074.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0076.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 19.
Summary:  min-size: auto should reference 'width' only for flex-basis: auto
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0459.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0007.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
Open:     NEEDS MORE REVIEW
----
Issue 20.
Summary:  Need keyword for 'auto' flex-basis, which no longer = max-content
Proposal: Rename 'auto' to something else, make 'auto' the auto keyword.
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0107.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0008.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0051.html
----
Issue 21.
Summary:  Cross-size of stretched flex size should be definite if flexbox is def
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0040.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0012.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Was already fixed in previous LC!
Verified:
----
Issue 22.
Summary:  Advise authors to reorder focus order together with box order
From:     PFWG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0247.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0256.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
----
Issue 23.
Summary:  Masonry effect
From:     JK
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0046.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0053.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
----
Issue 24.
Summary:  More precise definition for stretched items.
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0455.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0456.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0458.html
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 25.
Summary:  Add flex-wrap: balance
From:     Cory Brown
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0099.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0100.html
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
----
Issue 26.
Summary:  Better handling of main-axis percentages
From:     John Rimmer
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0290.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0010.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 27.
Summary:  Intrinsic sizes vs. percentage children
From:     fantasai and Tab Atkins
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0009.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0383.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
----
Issue 28.
Summary:  Clarify "any definite size constraints"
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0053.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0268.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0270.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0271.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0273.html
----
Issue 29.
Summary:  Possible typo in main-size keyword conversion
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0125.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0274.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 30.
Summary:  Restrict min-size: auto overflow check to appropriate axis
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0317.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0319.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 31.
Summary:  Question wrt interaction of text wrapping and flex wrapping
From:     Richard Dodd
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0395.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0440.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 32.
Summary:  What is the flexbox height when computed height is indefinite?
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0438.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0283.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 33.
Summary:  Shrinkwrapping of block-level flex containers undefined/suboptimal
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0502.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0293.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0293.html
----
Issue 34.
Summary:  Overflow directions should relate to content ordering
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0380.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0285.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Note:     Accepted edits into CSS Box Alignment instead.
----
Issue 35.
Summary:  min-content default problematic for scroll root descendants
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0589.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0282.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified:
----
Issue 36.
Summary:  Should intrinsic aspect ratio be considered?
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0609.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0616.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0042.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified:
----
Issue 37.
Summary:  Error in application of intrinsic ratio
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0098.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0288.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified:
----
Issue 38.
Summary:  Clarify non-application of ::first-line/::first-letter
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0099.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0099.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 39.
Summary:  max-content definition is wrong
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0277.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
----
Issue 40.
Summary:  Back-compat concerns with Issue 20 renaming of 'auto'
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0160.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0381.html
Open:     Closed as no change for now, but requesting more feedback during LC.
----