issues-cr-2016.bsi

Draft:    https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-cascade-4-20160114/
Title:    CSS Cascading and Inheritance Level 4

----
See also Level 3 Disposition of Comments: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-3/issues-cr-2016
----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Confusion over 'revert'
From:     Shane Stevens
Comment:  Revert depending on rolling back cascading and inheritance is hard
Response: It only affects the cascaded value, not the inherited value. Will clarify.
Changes:
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: TPAC 2016
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Need precise definition of aliasing
From:     Manish Goregaokar
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/866
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/866#issuecomment-399214678
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2ae2276b115ead42ab9d6a004ed4fb0152c4f6cc
Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0907a7d4fa3bf4ed4578c4f4e6e483ea8d07cc55
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0044.html
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Define interaction of variables and animations
From:     Greg Whitworth
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1079
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1079#issuecomment-399216813
Closed:   Deferred / OutOfScope
Notes:    Seems more of a Variables issue.
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Define animating all property
From:     François Remy
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1566
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1566#issuecomment-311222210
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1566#issuecomment-311407951
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1566#issuecomment-311232731
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Elements in the flat tree don't have values
From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1964
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2562
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2562#issuecomment-413772975
Closed:   Deferred / OutOfScope
----