csswg-drafts/css-flexbox-1/issues-lc-20140925.txt at b667648046860289ec447feddbad987969929ed2 · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
Draft:    http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-flexbox-1-20140925/
Title:    CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1

Overflow issues for next DoC:
  - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0411.html
    Compat risk warning
  - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0255.html
    True shrinkwrapping. More of a Sizing issue.
  - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0299.html
    Bunch of stuff to reject/defer

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Use preferred size instead of max-content size
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0385.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0424.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Flex item handling of anonymous boxes should be normative
From:     Alan Stearns
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0265.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0268.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0269.html
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Editorial nits
From:     Alan Stearns
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0267.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0431.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Alignment shouldn't depend on number of lines, but on wrappability
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0489.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0341.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0004.html
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Clarify sizing of abspos flex containers
From:     François Remy
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0396.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0191.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Error in stretch definition
From:     Greg Whitworth
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0429.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0430.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Alias no-wrap to nowrap
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0188.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0581.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0581.html
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Error in flex container max-content definition
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0443.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0340.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Scaled flex shrink factor should multiply by outer, not inner, base size
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0417.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0495.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  Revert 'flex-basis: auto' rename, add 'content' value instead
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0023.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0342.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0401.html
Followup: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0346.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Clarify that flex layout is writing-mode relative
From:     Addison Phillips
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0058.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0344.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  Example should state general case, put specific in parens, not vice versa
From:     Addison Phillips
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0060.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0343.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Why are there sheep?
From:     Addison Phillips
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0059.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0064.html
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  'flex' section needs editorial love
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0066.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: reporter is spec editor
8000
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  Stray references to old spec prose
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0078.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0089.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  'order' should affect speech/navigation order
From:     Bo Campbell
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0119.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0121.html
Closed:   Rejected
Note:     WG still open to further discussion on solving the relevant concerns,
          will follow up
----
Issue 17.
Summary:  Forced flex line breaking controls
From:     Glen Huang
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0322.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0336.html
Closed:   Deferred
----
Issue 18.
Summary:  Spec conflicts with itself on interpretation of break controls
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0349.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0263.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 19.
Summary:  Blink refuses to implement percentage-margin change
From:     Tab Atkins Jr.
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0521.html
Note:     Accepting this reversal will require a corresponding change to Grid.
Open
Note:     Issue noted, pending later discussion
----
Issue 20.
Summary:  Definite flexed size requires definite flex container main size
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0022.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 21.
Summary:  Clarify that flex base size doesn't include min/max clamping
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0377.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0428.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 22.
Summary:  Clarify whether layout is required for min/max-content sizing.
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0049.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0044.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 23.
Summary:  Should justify-self:stretch compute to flex-start, or just act like it?
From:     Javier Fernandez
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0247.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Note:     Filed against CSS Align
----
Issue 24.
Summary:  Static position of an abspos child of a flex container is confusingly defined
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0137.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0047.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 25.
Summary:  min-width:auto shouldn't take definite flex-basis into account
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0038.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0063.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 26.
Summary:  Some "flex basis" links are wrong
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0534.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0264.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----