-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 791
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-wd-2017.bsi
More file actions
867 lines (865 loc) · 34.5 KB
/
issues-wd-2017.bsi
File metadata and controls
867 lines (865 loc) · 34.5 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-display-3-20151015/
Title: CSS Display Module Level 3
Note: There were also issues on box-suppress, but it has been deferred to a future level to enable further work.
----
Issue 1.
Summary: table-caption & table-cell should use flow-root not flow
From: Oriol
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0372.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0064.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary: Define <br> and <wbr>
From: Ian Hickson, Tab Atkins
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0155.html
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610#issuecomment-274911199
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0065.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0066.html
Closed: Deferred to HTML https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2291
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
----
Issue 3.
Summary: Shouldn't root be in-flow?
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0332.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
----
Issue 5.
Summary: Interaction of run-in and ::first-letter
From: Florian Rivoal
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0330.html
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650#issuecomment-274908554
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
----
Issue 6.
Summary: Inconsistent implementation of 'display: flex' on <fieldset>
From: glanbin
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321#issuecomment-232788709
Closed: Invalid
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 7.
Summary: Consider removing 'display: run-in'
From: Ms2ger
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339#issuecomment-234783783
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
-----
Issue 8.
Summary: Define interaction of 'display: contents' and replaced elements
From: Simon Pieters
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540#issuecomment-285214950
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sQbKYcM6mmRueGJBozPGer_UwQDMyv+eww3kOBAHC7mg@mail.gmail.com
-----
Issue 9.
Summary: Display value visible to AT
From: Dave Cramer, Sara Soueidan
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560#issuecomment-270094051
Closed: OutOfScope
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 10.
Summary: Effect of 'display: contents' on counter scoping
From: Xidorn Quan
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/674
Response:
Closed: Accepted
Note: Still needs edits in css-lists-3.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary: Why is introduction normative? Also defining “element”?
From: Anne van Kesteren
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680#issuecomment-270103941
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 12.
Summary: 'display: contents' on root element
From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805#issuecomment-266991346
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 13.
Summary: “run-in box with 'display: flow'” nonsensical
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832#issuecomment-270106512
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 14.
Summary: "flow-root" harmful
From: Binyammin Laukstein
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275141140
Closed: Invalid
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275208753
----
Issue 15.
Summary: Rename flow-root
From: Simon Fraser
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964#issuecomment-274638719
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com
Verified: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com
----
Issue 16.
Summary: Tooltips are wrong
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834#issuecomment-280431244
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 17.
Summary: HTML shouldn't be a normative reference
From: Bert Bos
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011#issuecomment-286501361
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 18.
Summary: What are form controls?
From: Boris Zbarsky
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024#issuecomment-285215276
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 19.
Summary: Anonymous boxes inheriting from `display: contents`
From: Oriol, Boris Zbarsky
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1249
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301942276
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301953751
----
Issue 20.
Summary: Propagation of text-decoration applied to `display: contents`
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136#issuecomment-301938274
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9a8bdda32c4d22a2cbc98d6c3724b72f651b6b3
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html
----
Issue 21.
Summary: `display: block` seems to define flex and grid items as block-level
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292656095
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292738919
Response:
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 22.
Summary: Display erroneously groups ruby with atomic inlines
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180#issuecomment-292638199
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 23.
Summary: Block containers can also establish an inline formatting context
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301622704
Cloed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301630234
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-314583112
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 24.
Summary: Revisions to *-level definitions
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294637052
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294646968
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-301623329
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 25.
Summary: Do table captions participate in BFC or TFC?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189#issuecomment-301626461
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 26.
Summary: Table contins invalid values
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225#issuecomment-301631015
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 27.
Summary: list-item definition implies invalid keyword combos are valid
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226#issuecomment-301631288
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 28.
Summary: Do contents and none have outer display type?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227#issuecomment-301631748
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 29.
Summary: Run-in erroneously excludes blocks that establish inline formatting context
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228#issuecomment-301632605
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2f6354014360662e2aef0e25da433852d4fa8b3a
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 30.
Summary: Blockification rules not backwards-compatible for inline-block
From: Boris Zbarsky
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-301634850
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-305246779
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-313211986
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0042.html
----
Issue 31.
Summary: Rename “block container” to “flow container”
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301635795
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301639507
----
Issue 32.
Summary: Text nodes vs text runs
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281#issuecomment-301942809
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html
----
Issue 33.
Summary: Inheritance with 'display: contents' and ::first-line
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310#issuecomment-301641199
Closed: OutOfScope
Notes: Deferred to css-pseudo-4, as ::first-line in general needs tighter definition
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html
----
Issue 34.
Summary: Define 'display: contents' as a type of box
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299120942
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299247618
Closed: Retracted
----
Issue 35.
Summary: Define more sensible blockification for layout-internal types
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340#issuecomment-301641681
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5aaca4a7030e818cd02ac2d93137e1cd1d295bae
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 36.
Summary: Inlinification, recursion, and ruby vs display definitions
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301643296
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301944521
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-313204672
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html
----
Issue 37.
Summary: Does display: contents apply to ::before ::after
From: Emilio
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345#issuecomment-313205067
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html
----
Issue 38.
Summary: Define interaction of various box tree fixups
From: Boris Zbarsky
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301878155
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301888405
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302250667
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302748058
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f5b79e99bb8fc9ebea4ed956ed3420bc69b90786
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 39.
Summary: Root inline box vs anonymous inline boxes
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301832460
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301833956
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301872204
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6aeeabe060c8d8c1397ef2196a4e3a62da964d5e
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 40.
Summary: Inlinification by display type or anon box fixup?
From: fantasai
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390#issuecomment-313211238
Closed: Retracted
----
Issue 41.
Summary: Computation of 'float' vs 'position' without a box
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436#issuecomment-313215820
Closed: OutOfScope
Notes: Accepted, pending edits to css-2 and css-position-3
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0015.html
----
Issue 42.
Summary: Are run-in contents inside ::first-line?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313246128
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313249402
----
Issue 43.
Summary: “Becoming a formatting context” section is a mess
From: Oriol, fantasai
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457#issuecomment-313225448
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563#issuecomment-314573128
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/94982e838a558e6c66516b3b13e403eae32e27ad
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0030.html
----
Issue 44.
Summary: Is 'position: marker' out-of-flow?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458#issuecomment-313224602
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 45.
Summary: Does run-in algo recurse?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460#issuecomment-314593762
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c9f1bb16d0e5077b9bca7027a7d7252eeff5abf1
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 46.
Summary: Parallel construction should be pairwise disjoint (editorial)
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1470
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/09212af80e10e4e3e57965bb27b2de3fdcd86e06
Closed: Fixed
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 47.
Summary: BFC definition not quite right
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313240736
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313247457
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313263022
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313252408
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313266528
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ffc79e46b2f691d334b00d69ed23dde50a4068b3
Closed: Accepted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ffc79e46b2f691d334b00d69ed23dde50a4068b3
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 48.
Summary: Run-in fixup vs block-in-inline fixup
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472#issuecomment-313242917
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 49.
Summary: Note wrt inheritance of ::first-line through 'display: contents'.
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473#issuecomment-313247421
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 50.
Summary: Display types: on elements or on boxes?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314569164
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314583675
----
Issue 51.
Summary: Should 'inline-foo' and 'inline foo' be distinct?
From: David Baron
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486#issuecomment-320022628
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 52.
Summary: At-risk list omits three-component values
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1490
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/394c62f72fda4ac824c9ce204a99bf991b9e6471
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 53.
Summary: Discrepencies in run-in
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491#issuecomment-314570280
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 54.
Summary: Serialization of list-item values not listed
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493#issuecomment-314572350
Closed: OutOfScope (to CSSOM) / Rejected (for editorial)
Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial
----
Issue 55.
Summary: Missing definition of 'inline-list-item'
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495#issuecomment-306282449
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0015.html
----
Issue 56.
Summary: Redesign 'flow-root' keyword and related features
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496#issuecomment-319986260
Closed: Rejected
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496#issuecomment-320027059
----
Issue 57.
Summary: Inlinification doesn't inlinify layout-internal boxes
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582#issuecomment-314605575
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 58.
Summary: <legend> with no box example is confusing
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494427
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494885
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313498359
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-391181313
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/beb5964179f6fc815e59e23a1de501cddab7355a
Closed: Accepted
Notes: See also https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/3702
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 59.
Summary: Blocks that contain only inlines, establishing BFC+IFC?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553#issuecomment-375120025
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/8bb4d824180eccee53864aa40b883d0eb7140c0a
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 60.
Summary: Define establishing a BFC as a flow-root only thing via used values
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550#issuecomment-387160020
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0258e7ac526cffce6e81d13110ba79a681504fff
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/72141508e866058bd9a431abdb97c3406d9e34b2
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html
----
Issue 61.
Summary: Is the principal box unique?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1604
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1604#issuecomment-374366647
Closed: OutOfScope
Notes: Follow-up for css-flow-3 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1477
----
Issue 62.
Summary: run-in fixup should create inline-block when parent inlinifies
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1607
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1607#issuecomment-374368323
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 63.
Summary: Define how block containers establish an inline formatting context
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374369526
Closed: Accepted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374376423
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374385637
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-398958073
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 64.
Summary: Position of 'list-item' when serializing 'display'
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1621
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1621#issuecomment-374730492
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 65.
Summary: Clarify that outer display type only affects principal box
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1622
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c5d8900d4cc8dedd4f7a02d506d0e0cd2cb5a639
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 66.
Summary: Compact at-risk list
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1623
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/9f72f245cba50a173813c36b771f552fe8104964
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 67.
Summary: list-item generates ::marker pseudo-element (not necessarily box)
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1625
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ed5c6a31724e014f3336dbf7901c5ef5cb1eaf20
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 68.
Summary: Mismatched references (to CSS2 vs css-lists-3)
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1626
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1626#issuecomment-374373751
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/7af6650e9ad441bac22fe833cb413112262f9149
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 69.
Summary: Mention that block ruby generates principal block box
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1629
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5e90348a26aecbed6d878cce89cbbc7db1b058ff
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 70.
Summary: run-in insertion point vs ::marker with 'display'
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1638
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1638#issuecomment-316979494
Closed: Retracted
----
Issue 71.
Summary: Are run-in sequences merged during reparenting?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1639
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ef3c8fd8b2fe85c32a2dc393ca3b2810a414ea88
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 72.
Summary: Clarify run-in recursion vs anonymous-block wrapping
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-374384660
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c7841af7ab963a5e91b2436ffe60ece80700cc7e
Closed: Accepted
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-374390920
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-398963365
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 73.
Summary: Define inner display type of replaced elements
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-374399290
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 74.
Summary: How does inner display type compute on replaced elements if out of scope?
From: Sebastien Zartner
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-317237475
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-398964350
Closed: Invalid
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 75.
Summary: Define style computation reflection between boxes and elements
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-350398313
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1702
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1702#issuecomment-374415941
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/b2d484c6ab9c4dbdb8fdca899e2d37d59d6953e3
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html
----
Issue 76.
Summary: Define some box construction guidance for specs
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643
<
E776
div>
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-350398313
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/533ac0a31b0262c4a0d09c77e19604666fe35e14
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html
----
Issue 77.
Summary: table grid box is not a defined term
From: David Baron
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-376733708
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-378768000
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/193022f623acd1b95a1fddae76fd98408a618d8b
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 78.
Summary: Rename table box to table grid box (in CSS2 & CSS Tables L3)
From: fantasai
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2501
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2501#issuecomment-380792875
Open: Changing back is pending edits to CSS2 and css-tables-3
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0044.html
----
Issue 79.
Summary: Boxes shouldn't have display types, should only have levels/FC-types
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-374423595
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-407597682
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 80.
Summary: Explicitly exclude non-zero sequences of run-ins from processing
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663#issuecomment-398970537
Closed: Rejected
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663#issuecomment-398982401
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 81.
Summary: Link to definition of white space
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1664
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ada381e196c8ed510977cb55916ee5fb96447b25
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 82.
Summary: s/text/text run/ now that text run is defined
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1667
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c3a695c65170e1667090d87310b87df79d93d398
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 83.
Summary: What if containing block is not ICB and not generated from a box?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-319916887
Closed: Invalid
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-350404179
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-374790036
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 84.
Summary: Make inlinified 'block ruby' an inline-block instead of inline
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1700
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1700#issuecomment-374415499
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 85.
Summary: 'block' only generates block-level boxes in flow layout
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1704
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1704#issuecomment-374418771
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/4358d72a927b265d9b7482a57277dc635c076b76
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 86.
Summary: Clarify blockification of 'run-in flow-root'
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1715
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1715#issuecomment-374420463
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html
----
Issue 87.
Summary: 'display' computed value wrong in propdef table
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1716
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1716
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 89.
Summary: Do empty text nodes generate text runs?
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1808
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1808#issuecomment-329345715
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/4c21a2aa923a757c577bf4a4e33a6291a78c8690
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 90.
Summary: Clarify element tree definition
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1810
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1810#issuecomment-375137826
Closed: OutOfScope
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html
----
Issue 91.
Summary: SVG 'display: contents' interaction incompletely defined
From: Rune Lillesveen
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2118
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2118#issuecomment-374802030
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2cdf747bbbfe0c58a87455beca9c35b72555b09a
Closed: Accepted
----
Issue 92.
Summary: Define interaction of 'display: contents' and MathML
From: Emilio Álvarez
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167#issuecomment-375119086
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/1d3e6a04c847df82fa3c4023e23f4ea55dcab169
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167#issuecomment-375792285
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html
----
Issue 93.
Summary: Does 'display' affect screen reader semantics?
From: Ilya Streltsyn
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-368287740
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-375084853
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378670370
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378778909
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 94.
Summary: Does 'display: contents' affect anchor targeting?
From: Ilya Streltsyn
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378842501
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378992876
Changes: https://github.com/fergald/csswg-drafts/commit/2343af6382b55e8ce5caf9c0ee40d68ef032b421
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editor discretion
----
Issue 95.
Summary: Effect of 'display: contents' on SVG layout attributes
From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-378809174
Closed: Accepted
Veified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-399498551
----
Issue 96.
Summary: Integrate definition of Shadow Trees
From: Anne van Kesteren
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2365
Closed: OutOfScope
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html
----
Issue 97.
Summary: Blockification should establish a new formatting context
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2598
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2598#issuecomment-387157017
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 98.
Summary: Swap where default inner/outer display types are defined
From: Oriol
Commment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658#issuecomment-391175246
Closed: Rejected
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658#issuecomment-393271657
Resolved: Editorial
---
Issue 99.
Summary: Blockification of blocks should establish new FC
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2673
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2673#issuecomment-389935782
Closed: Rejected
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0017.html
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0017.html
----
Issue 100.
Summary: Compute 'display: contents' on elided elements to 'none'
From: Emlio Álvarez
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2755
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f13b84237c6a17823ebdd55919d15d3bac83275b
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jun/0032.html
----
Issue 101.
Summary: Revisit equivalency of `inline-block` and `inline flow-root`
From: Oriol Brufau
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2947
Closed: Rejected
Notes: See also earlier issues / discussion.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0018.html
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0018.html
----