csswg-drafts/css-ui-3/issues-2015-2017.txt at ccd94deea1eb5243842ff4e76382d5eb67e6e71c · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Draft:    https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-css-ui-3-20150707/
Title:    CSS Basic User Interface Module Level 3 (CSS3 UI)

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Markup error
From:     Chris Rebert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0455.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0460.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Typos and grammer errors
From:     Timeless
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0164.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0148.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Clarify hit-testing for the cursor-property
From:     Chris Rebert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0010.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0005.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-test/pull/800#issuecomment-137299957
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0040.html
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Resize should apply to replaced elements
From:     Elika Etemad
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0333.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0004.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0252.html
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Section titles do not match convention
From:     Elika Etemad
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0299.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0072.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Missing context makes statement hard to understand
From:     Elika Etemad
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0301.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0073.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  The combinators and multipliers within the syntaxes should link to the CSS Values module
From:     Sebastian Zartner
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/147
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c0c700f9c8b29ba77a5861937a4097f2440ad1f2
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/147#issuecomment-223494303
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Add outline-offset to shorthand
From:     Yoksel
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/441
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/441#issuecomment-244638068<Paste>
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/441#issuecomment-248137532
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Remove outline-color: invert
From:     Chrishtr
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/423
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/423#issuecomment-242421803
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/423#issuecomment-265858664
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0079.html
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  Should caret-color apply to any element?
From:     Rego Casasnovas
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725#issuecomment-263936054
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725#issuecomment-264031876
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0123.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Allow annimation to/from caret-color:auto
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781#issuecomment-266428994
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781#issuecomment-266952449
Closed:   Retracted
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781#issuecomment-267304148
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  Phrasing of computed value of caret-color ambiguous despite clear intent
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/741
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0123.html
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/741#issuecomment-275015837
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial
----