csswg-drafts/css3-syntax/issues.txt at ef116064d671a012844ca7ceeb49cd3f1effe2fa · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2001JulSep/att-0238/01-selectors.html

http://www.w3.org/Style/Group/css3-src/css3-naming/
css-style-attr?


Note to self:  need to add to syntax draft:
 * @namespace stuff
 * Bert's extensions stuff
 [ * grammar of style attribute? -- NO, separate draft ]

How should grammar connect to selectors?

Should , be in selectors or in grammar / C&I?

Does C&I specify use of selectors draft correctly?

Should we allow nested @-rules within @media?

See Björn Höhrmann's 2001-09-19 post and thread following.


Also:

  Selectors draft should list terminology change in the changes section.

  Definition of 'font-size' in fonts module.

  "\A" in generated content

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Mar/0021.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002JanMar/0383.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2001AprJun/0281.html
  http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138415
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002AprJun/0170.html

  Should the parsing rules be looser for unknown pseudos?

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2001OctDec/0006.html

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002JulSep/thread.html#294

  Steven Pemberton's message about parseable sequences of tokens:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002OctDec/0249.html

  untokenizable / unparseable sequences:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Nov/0014.html

  missing whitespace:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Nov/0012.html