-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 791
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-lc-20150514.txt
More file actions
226 lines (225 loc) · 8.87 KB
/
issues-lc-20150514.txt
File metadata and controls
226 lines (225 loc) · 8.87 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-flexbox-1-20150514/
Title: CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 3
----
Issue 1.
Summary: min/max-content sizes of flex containers incorrectly defined
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0429.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0212.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0189.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 2.
Summary: Should min/max-content sizes of flex containers include flex-basis?
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0212.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0007.html
Closed: Retracted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 3.
Summary: Can percentages resolve given min-size: auto?
From: Daniel Holbert
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0031.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0205.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0014.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
Verified: reporter participated in task force that proposed resolution
----
Issue 4.
Summary: Quirks mode percentage size resolution, 'flex: 1', and intrinsic heights
From: Christian Biesinger
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0027.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0232.html
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 5.
Summary: Static position of abspos incompatible with css-align definition
From: Christian Biesinger
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0357.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0018.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0142.html
Verified: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20151202#l-49
----
Issue 6.
Summary: Do flex item determination before anonymous box fixup.
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0246.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 7.
Summary: Clarify % margin/padding behavior
From: Daniel Holbert
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0052.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0190.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 8.
Summary: Add a11y requirements to authoring tools
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0180.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0348.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 9.
Summary: Editorial Comments
From: timeless
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0075.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0085.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0344.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0346.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 10.
Summary: Broken Styling
From: Ryan Prichard
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0020.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0027.html
Closed: Accepted
Note: Bug appears to have disappeared?
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 11.
Summary: Blink objects to percentage-margin change
From: Tab Atkins Jr.
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0521.html
Note: Accepting this reversal will require a corresponding change to Grid.
Closed: Accepted
Notes: Amended spec to allow both behaviors, as the CSSWG had no consensus.
Verified: reporter is editor
Minutes: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0113.html
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0233.html
----
Issue 12.
Summary: Intrinsic Cross size of flex container totally wrong
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-s
8000
tyle/2015Aug/0253.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0055.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0233.html
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 13.
Summary: Revert omitted flex-basis 0 -> 0% change
From fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0429.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0212.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 14.
Summary: Use first available baseline instead of first item's baseline
From: timeless
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0345.html
Response:
Closed: Rejected
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html
----
Issue 15.
Summary: Add a tab-order property
From: Bo Campbell
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0285.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0347.html
Closed: Rejected
----
Issue 16.
Summary: Are abspos whose containing block is flexbox affected by % resolution change?
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0154.html
Open: Depends on issue #11
Note: WG appears to lean towards consistency within grid/flex over consistency within abspos
----
Issue 18.
Summary: Minimum spacing between flex items vs. around flex items
From: Den
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0108.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0109.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0151.html
Closed: Deferred
----
Issue 19.
Summary: Blockify internal table elements instead of wrapping them in anonymous boxes
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0246.html
Response:
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 20.
Summary: Applies-to error for justify-items
From: Javier Fernandez
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0413.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0425.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 21.
Summary: Interaction of min-height: auto and scrollbars
From: Christian Biesinger
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0022.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0023.html
Closed: Question
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0024.html
----
Issue 22.
Summary: Editorial comments
From: timeless
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0075.html
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0085.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0344.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0346.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 23.
Summary: Typo?
From: Christian Biesinger
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0224.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0225.html
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 24.
Summary: Breaking lines at max-height/width not defined
From: Christian Biesinger
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0099.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0021.html
Closed: Invalid
----
Issue 25.
Summary: <textarea> as flex container
From: John Waterson
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0115.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0116.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0024.html
Closed: OutOfScope
----
Issue 26.
Summary: Percentages resolving against definite max-height
From: Tab and fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0067.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0029.html
Closed: Invalid
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0029.html
----
Issue 27.
Summary: Fragmentation rule forces break-inside: avoid
From: fantasai
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0163.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0233.html
Verified: Reporter is spec editor
----