[css-flexbox] Put the pagination rule back with s/some/none/ as suggested in the proposed resolution. Switch OL to UL for two options

Author: fantasai

css-flexbox/Overview.bs

@@ -686,12 +686,13 @@ Flex Item Margins and Paddings</h3>
 
 	Percentage margins and paddings on <a>flex items</a> can be resolved against either:
 
-	1. their own axis (left/right percentages resolve against width, top/bottom resolve against height)
-	2. the inline axis (left/right/top/bottom percentages all resolve against width)
+	* their own axis (left/right percentages resolve against width, top/bottom resolve against height), or,
+	* the inline axis (left/right/top/bottom percentages all resolve against width)
 
 	A User Agent must choose one of these two behaviors.
 
-	Note: This behavior sucks, but it accurately captures the current state of the world.
+	Note: This variance sucks, but it accurately captures the current state of the world
+	(no consensus among implementations, and no consensus within the CSSWG).
 	It is the CSSWG's intention that browsers will converge on one of the behaviors,
 	at which time the spec will be amended to require that.
 
@@ -2859,6 +2860,11 @@ Fragmenting Flex Layout</h2>
 			If as a result of this adjustment the available space becomes negative,
 			it is set to zero.
 
+		<li>
+			If the first fragment of the flex container is not at the top of the page,
+			and none of its flex items fit in the remaining space on the page,
+			the entire fragment is moved to the next page.
+
 		<li>
 			When a <a>multi-line</a> column flex container breaks,
 			each fragment has its own "stack" of flex lines,

css-flexbox/issues-lc-20150514.txt

@@ -92,7 +92,11 @@ Summary:  Blink objects to percentage-margin change
 From:     Tab Atkins Jr.
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0521.html
 Note:     Accepting this reversal will require a corresponding change to Grid.
-Open
+Open:     Amended spec to allow both behaviors, as the CSSWG had no consensus.
+Minutes:
+          https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
+          https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0113.html
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0233.html
 ----
 Issue 12.
 Summary:  Intrinsic Cross size of flex container totally wrong
@@ -215,5 +219,7 @@ Issue 27.
 Summary:  Fragmentation rule forces break-inside: avoid
 From:     fantasai
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0163.html
-Open
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0233.html
+Verified: Reporter is spec editor
 ----