@@ -3789,7 +3789,8 @@ Resolve Intrinsic Track Sizes</h3>
37893789
37903790 <li id="algo-single-span-items">
37913791 <strong> Size tracks to fit non-spanning items:</strong>
3792- For each track with an intrinsic <a>track sizing function</a> ,
3792+ For each track with an intrinsic <a>track sizing function</a>
3793+ and not a <a>flexible sizing function</a> ,
37933794 consider the items in it with a span of 1:
37943795
37953796 <dl class="switch">
@@ -3847,7 +3848,7 @@ Resolve Intrinsic Track Sizes</h3>
38473848 increase the <a>growth limit</a> to match the <a>base size</a> .
38483849
38493850 <li id="algo-spanning-items">
3850- <strong> Increase sizes to accommodate spanning items:</strong>
3851+ <strong> Increase sizes to accommodate spanning items crossing content-sized tracks :</strong>
38513852 Next, consider the items with a span of 2
38523853 that do not span a track with a <a>flexible sizing function</a> ,
38533854 treating a <a>min track sizing function</a> of ''auto''
@@ -3939,6 +3940,27 @@ Resolve Intrinsic Track Sizes</h3>
39393940
39403941 Repeat incrementally for items with greater spans until all items have been considered.
39413942
3943+ <li id="algo-spanning-flex-items">
3944+ <strong> Increase sizes to accommodate spanning items crossing flexible tracks:</strong>
3945+ Next, repeat the previous step
3946+ instead considering (together, rather than grouped by span size)
3947+ all items
3948+ that <em> do</em> span a track with a <a>flexible sizing function</a>
3949+ while
3950+ <ul>
3951+ <li>
3952+ treating flexible tracks as having
3953+ a <a>max track sizing function</a> equal to their <a>min track sizing function</a>
3954+ <li>
3955+ distributing space <em> only</em> to flexible tracks
3956+ (i.e. treating all other tracks as having a <a>fixed sizing function</a>
3957+ of their current <a>base size</a> )
3958+ <li>
3959+ distributing space to such tracks
3960+ according to the ratios of their <a>flexible sizing functions</a>
3961+ rather than distributing space equally
3962+ </ul>
3963+
39423964 <li id="algo-finite-growth">
39433965 If any track still has an infinite <a>growth limit</a>
39443966 (because, for example, it had no items placed in it),
@@ -4305,6 +4327,45 @@ Major Changes</h4>
43054327 they must be resolved against the inline dimension, as for blocks.
43064328 (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2085">Issue 2085</a> )
43074329
4330+ <li id="change-2017-span-flexible-tracks">
4331+ Adjusted handling of items spanning flexible tracks
4332+ to intrinsic track sizes so that
4333+ they contribute to the size of flexible tracks that have an intrinsic min
4334+ rather than being ignored.
4335+ (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2177">Issue 2177</a> )
4336+ <blockquote>
4337+ <ul>
4338+ <li>
4339+ <strong> Size tracks to fit non-spanning items:</strong>
4340+ For each track with an intrinsic <a>track sizing function</a>
4341+ <ins> and not a <a>flexible sizing function</a> </ins> ,
4342+ consider the items in it with a span of 1:
4343+ <li>
4344+ …
4345+ <li>
4346+ <ins><strong> Increase sizes to accommodate spanning items crossing flexible tracks:</strong>
4347+ Next, repeat the previous step
4348+ instead considering (together, rather than grouped by span size)
4349+ all items
4350+ that <em> do</em> span a track with a <a>flexible sizing function</a>
4351+ while
4352+ <ul>
4353+ <li>
4354+ treating flexible tracks as having
4355+ a <a>max track sizing function</a> equal to their <a>min track sizing function</a>
4356+ <li>
4357+ distributing space <em> only</em> to flexible tracks
4358+ (i.e. treating all other tracks as having a <a>fixed sizing function</a>
4359+ of their current <a>base size</a> )
4360+ <li>
4361+ distributing space to such tracks
4362+ according to the ratios of their <a>flexible sizing functions</a>
4363+ rather than distributing space equally
4364+ </ul>
4365+ </ins>
4366+ </ul>
4367+ </blockquote>
4368+
43084369 <li id="change-2017-repeat-serialization">
43094370 Require the used value of a track listing
43104371 to be serialized without using ''repeat()'' notation.
0 commit comments