[css-nesting-1] Clarify specificity of relative nested selectors. #9069

Author: tabatkins

css-nesting-1/Overview.bs

@@ -292,6 +292,11 @@ Syntax {#syntax}
 	along with its contents,
 	but does not invalidate its parent rule.
 
+	Nested rules with [=relative selectors=]
+	include the specificity of their implied [=nesting selector=].
+	For example, ''.foo { > .bar {...}}'' and ''.foo { & > .bar {...}}''
+	have the same specificity for their inner rule.
+
 	<div class=note>
 		Some CSS-generating tools that preprocess nesting
 		will concatenate selectors as strings,
@@ -358,7 +363,15 @@ Syntax {#syntax}
 	when we move ''&'' itself to Selectors;
 	I'm monkey-patching for convenience here.
 
-<!-- Big Text: example -->
+<!--
+████████ ██     ██    ███    ██     ██ ████████  ██       ████████
+██        ██   ██    ██ ██   ███   ███ ██     ██ ██       ██
+██         ██ ██    ██   ██  ████ ████ ██     ██ ██       ██
+██████      ███    ██     ██ ██ ███ ██ ████████  ██       ██████
+██         ██ ██   █████████ ██     ██ ██        ██       ██
+██        ██   ██  ██     ██ ██     ██ ██        ██       ██
+████████ ██     ██ ██     ██ ██     ██ ██        ████████ ████████
+-->
 
 <h3 id=syntax-examples>
 Examples</h3>