You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: css-grid/Overview.bs
+18-15Lines changed: 18 additions & 15 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
1
1
<h1>CSS Grid Layout Module Level 1</h1>
2
2
3
3
<pre class='metadata'>
4
-
Status: ED
5
-
Work Status: Refining
4
+
Deadline: 2017-06-30
5
+
Date: 2016-09-30
6
+
Status: CR
7
+
Work Status: Testing
6
8
Shortname: css-grid
7
9
Level: 1
8
10
Group: csswg
@@ -895,7 +897,9 @@ Sizing Grid Containers</h3>
895
897
896
898
In both inline and block formatting contexts,
897
899
the <a>grid container</a>’s ''auto''<a>block size</a> is its max-content size.
898
-
<span class="issue">The block layout spec should define this?</span>
900
+
901
+
<span class="note">The block layout spec should probably define this,
902
+
but it isn't written yet.</span>
899
903
900
904
The <a>max-content size</a> of a <a>grid container</a> is
901
905
the sum of the <a>grid container’s</a> track sizes (including gutters)
@@ -3599,8 +3603,9 @@ Grid Sizing Algorithm</h3>
3599
3603
had that size and all other rows were infinite.
3600
3604
3601
3605
<div class="issue">
3602
-
Alternatively, we could
3603
-
assume the <a>available space</a> that it would have as the maximum of:
3606
+
Would it help to have <a href="https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0128.html">heuristics</a>
3607
+
that attempt a more accurate initial estimate?
3608
+
E.g. assuming the <a>available space</a> that it would have as the maximum of:
3604
3609
3605
3610
<ul>
3606
3611
<li>
@@ -3622,8 +3627,8 @@ Grid Sizing Algorithm</h3>
3622
3627
or a ''max-content'', ''auto'', or <<flex>> max sizing function.
3623
3628
</ul>
3624
3629
3625
-
This is likely to reduce the amount of re-layout passes that are necessary,
3626
-
but will it produce a different result in any cases?
3630
+
This is may reduce the amount of re-layout passes that are necessary,
3631
+
but will it produce a different or better result in any cases?
3627
3632
Should we adopt it into the spec?
3628
3633
</div>
3629
3634
@@ -3645,10 +3650,6 @@ Grid Sizing Algorithm</h3>
3645
3650
and <a spec=css-multicol>multi-column elements</a>.
3646
3651
</div>
3647
3652
3648
-
Issue: Is one cycle enough?
3649
-
3650
-
Issue: Would it help to have <a href="https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0128.html">smarter heuristics</a> for the initial size calculation?
3651
-
3652
3653
<li>
3653
3654
Finally, the <a>grid container</a> is sized
3654
3655
using the resulting size of the <a>grid</a> as its content size,
0 commit comments