[css-grid] Update Changes list

Author: fantasai

css-grid-1/Overview.bs

@@ -891,8 +891,8 @@ Sizing Grid Containers</h3>
 
 	<ul>
 		<li>
-			As a block-level box in a <a>block formatting context</a>,
-			it is sized like a block box that establishes a formatting context,
+			As a <a>block-level</a> box in a <a>block formatting context</a>,
+			it is sized like a <a>block box</a> that establishes a formatting context,
 			with an ''auto'' <a>inline size</a> calculated as for non-replaced block boxes.
 		<li>
 			As an inline-level box in an <a>inline formatting context</a>,
@@ -4257,8 +4257,8 @@ Major Changes</h4>
 			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1036">Issue 1036</a>)
 
 		<li id="change-2016-grid-gap">
-			Removed 'grid-row-gap', 'grid-column-gap', and 'grid-gap' properties,
-			replacing with 'row-gap', 'column-gap', and 'gap'
+			<strong>Removed 'grid-row-gap', 'grid-column-gap', and 'grid-gap' properties,
+			replacing with 'row-gap', 'column-gap', and 'gap'</strong>
 			which are now defined in <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css-align-3/">CSS Box Alignment</a>.
 			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1696">Issue 1696</a>)
 
@@ -4329,7 +4329,7 @@ Significant Adjustments and Fixes</h4>
 		<li id="change-2016-stretch-algo">
 			Better integrated ''justify-content/stretch'' sizing of grid tracks
 			into the track sizing algorithm.
-			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1150">Issue 1150</a>)
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1150">Issue 1150</a>, <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1866">Issue 1866</a>)
 			<blockquote>
 				<p>and the tracks are aligned within the <a>grid container</a>
 				according to the 'align-content' and 'justify-content' properties.
@@ -4360,7 +4360,11 @@ Significant Adjustments and Fixes</h4>
 				<p>This step sizes expands tracks that have
 				an ''grid-template-columns/auto'' <a>max track sizing function</a>
 				by dividing any remaining positive, <a>definite</a> <a>free space</a>
-				equally amongst them.</p>
+				equally amongst them.
+				If the <a>free space</a> is <a>indefinite</a>,
+				but the <a>grid container</a> has a <a>definite</a> <a property lt=min-width>min-width/height</a>,
+				use that size to calculate the <a>free space</a> for this step instead.
+				</p>
 			</ins>
 			</blockquote>
 
@@ -4527,22 +4531,64 @@ Significant Adjustments and Fixes</h4>
 				</ol>
 			</blockquote>
 
+		<li id="change-2016-definite-tracks">
+			Specified that <a>grid areas</a> are considered <a>definite</a>
+			for the purpose of laying out <a>grid items</a>
+			after track sizing is done.
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1319">Issue 1319</a>,
+			<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1320">Issue 1320</a>)
+			<blockquote>
+				<p>Once the size of each <a>grid area</a> is thus established,
+				the <a>grid items</a> are laid out into their respective containing blocks.
+				<ins>The <a>grid area’s</a> width and height are considered <a>definite</a> for this purpose.</ins></p>
+				<ins><!-- empty line for Bikeshed to generate Note correctly -->
+
+					Note: Since formulas calculated using only definite sizes,
+					such as the <a>stretch fit</a> formula,
+					are also definite,
+					the size of a grid item which is stretched
+					is also considered definite.
+				</ins>
+			</blockquote>
+		<li id="change-2016-in-flow-block">
+			Fixed error in <a>block-level</a> <a>grid container</a> sizing definition:
+			in-flow block-level <a>grid containers</a> use the <a>stretch-fit size</a>
+			while out-of-flow block-level grids use the <a>fit-content size</a>,
+			exactly as non-replaced <a>block boxes</a> do.
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1734">Issue 1734</a>)
+			<blockquote>
+				As a <a>block-level</a> box in a <a>block formatting context</a>,
+				it is sized like a <a>block box</a> that establishes a formatting context,
+				with an ''auto'' <a>inline size</a> calculated as for <del>in-flow</del><ins>non-replaced</a> block boxes.
+			</blockquote>
+		<li id="change-2016-tracks-before">
+			Fixed error in pattern repetition for finding <a>implicit grid track</a> sizes.
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1356">Issue 1356</a>)
+			<blockquote>
+				<p>If multiple track sizes are given, the pattern is repeated as necessary
+				to find the size of the implicit tracks.
+				The first <a>implicit grid track</a> <del>before</del> <ins>after</ins> the <a>explicit grid</a>
+				receives the first specified size, and so on forwards;
+				and the last <a>implicit grid track</a> before the <a>explicit grid</a>
+				receives the last specified size, and so on backwards.
+			</blockquote>
+	</ul>
+
+<h4 id="clarify-2016">
+Clarifications</h4>
+
+	<ul id="change-2016-auto-min-editorial">
 		<li id="change-2016-fit-content-stretch">
 			Clarified that ''fit-content()'' is not affected by ''align-content/stretch'' 'align-content'/'justify-content'.
-			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1732">Issue 1732</a>
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1732">Issue 1732</a>)
 			<blockquote>
 				<p>Represents the formula
 				<code>min(''max-content'', max(''auto'', <var>argument</var>))</code>,
 				which is calculated <ins>like</ins> <del>similar to ''auto'' (i.e.</del> ''minmax(auto, max-content)''<del>)</del>,
 				except that the track size is clamped at <var>argument</var>
 				if it is greater than the ''auto'' minimum.
 			</blockquote>
-	</ul>
 
-<h4 id="clarify-2016">
-Clarifications</h4>
-
-	<ul  id="change-2016-auto-min-editorial">
 		<li>
 			Clarified definition of <a>min-size contribution</a>.
 			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/507">Issue #507</a>)
@@ -4581,7 +4627,22 @@ Clarifications</h4>
 				and treating <a>collapsed gutters</a>
 				as a single opportunity for space insertion.</ins>
 			</blockquote>
-		<li>Miscellaneous trivial fixes: broken references, typos, etc.
+		<li id="change-2016-leftover-space">
+			Changed description of <a>flexible length</a>
+			to use “leftover space” instead of “free space”
+			to avoid mixing up concepts under the same name.
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1120">Issue #1120</a>)
+		<li id="change-2016-maximize-base-sizes">
+			Clarified that the <a href="#algo-grow-tracks">Maximize Tracks</a> step
+			grows the <a>base sizes</a> of the tracks.
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1120">Issue #1120</a>)
+			<blockquote>
+				If the <a>free space</a> is positive, distribute it equally
+				to <ins>the <a>base sizes</a> of</ins> all tracks,
+				freezing tracks as they reach their <a>growth limits</a>
+				(and continuing to grow the unfrozen tracks as needed).
+			</blockquote>
+		<li>Miscellaneous trivial fixes and minor editorial improvements.
 	</ul>