[css-flexbox] Make informative statement informative and more explanatory.

Author: fantasai

css-flexbox/Overview.bs

@@ -1525,7 +1525,10 @@ The 'flex' Shorthand</h3>
 				relative to the rest of the <a>flex items</a> in the flex container
 				when negative free space is distributed.
 				When omitted, it is set to ''1''.
-				The <a>flex shrink factor</a> is multiplied by the <a>flex basis</a> when distributing negative space.
+
+				Note: The <a>flex shrink factor</a> is multiplied by the <a>flex base size</a> when distributing negative space.
+				This distributes negative space in proportion to how much the item is able to shrink,
+				so that e.g. a small item won't shrink to zero before a larger item has been noticeably reduced.
 
 		<dt><dfn><<'flex-basis'>></dfn>
 		<dd>
@@ -1542,7 +1545,8 @@ The 'flex' Shorthand</h3>
 				If the specified 'flex-basis' is ''flex-basis/auto'',
 				the used <a>flex basis</a> is the computed value of the flex item’s <a>main size property</a>.
 				If that value is itself ''width/auto'',
-				then the used <a>flex basis</a> is automatically-determined based on its content (i.e. ''content'').
+				then the used <a>flex basis</a> is automatically-determined based on its content
+				(i.e. sized as for ''content'').
 
 		<dt><dfn>none</dfn>
 		<dd>

css-flexbox/issues-lc-20140925.txt

@@ -1,6 +1,17 @@
 Draft:    http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-flexbox-1-20140925/
 Title:    CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1
 
+Overflow issues for next DoC:
+  - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0377.html
+    https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0428.html
+    Request for clarification
+  - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0411.html
+    Compat risk warning
+  - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0255.html
+    True shrinkwrapping. More of a Sizing issue.
+  - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0299.html
+    Bunch of stuff to reject/defer
+
 ----
 Issue 1.
 Summary:  Use preferred size instead of max-content size
@@ -122,7 +133,7 @@ Summary:  'order' should affect speech/navigation order
 From:     Bo Campbell
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0119.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0121.html
-Open:     Rejected, but still under discussion by WG.
+Closed:   Rejected, but still under discussion by WG.
 ----
 Issue 17.
 Summary:  Forced flex line breaking controls