8000 css-multicol-1] Removing reference to breaking values from the introd… · w3c/csswg-drafts@5838344 · GitHub
Skip to content

Commit 5838344

Browse files
rachelandrewrachelandrew
committed
css-multicol-1] Removing reference to breaking values from the introduction. Fixes #1966 
1 parent ad0f491 commit 5838344

2 files changed

Lines changed: 17 additions & 21 deletions

File tree

‎css-multicol-1/Overview.bs‎

Lines changed: 1 addition & 21 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -145,27 +145,6 @@ Introduction</h2>
145145
This specification introduces ten new properties, all of which
146146
are used in the examples above.
147147

148-
To indicate where column breaks should (or should not) appear, new
149-
keyword values are introduced.
150-
151-
<div class=example>
152-
In this example, <code>h1</code> elements will always have a column
153-
break before them, but the formatter will try to avoid column breaks
154-
inside and after the element.
155-
< 7440 code>156-
<pre>
157-
h1 {
158-
break-before: column;
159-
break-inside: avoid-column;
160-
break-after: avoid-column;
161-
}
162-
</pre>
163-
164-
<!--
165-
The properties and values used in this example are formally defined in [!CSS3PAGE]].
166-
-->
167-
</div>
168-
169148
If all column properties have their initial value, the layout of
170149
an element will be identical to a multi-column layout with only one
171150
column.
@@ -1729,6 +1708,7 @@ This appendix is <em>informative</em>.
17291708

17301709
<h3 id="changes-from-20171005">Changes from the <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-multicol-1-20171005/">Working Draft (WD) of 5 October 2017</a></h3>
17311710
<ul>
1711+
<li>Removed the sentence "To indicate where column breaks should (or should not) appear, new keyword values are introduced." and following example (Example 7 in the WD published <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-multicol-1-20171005/">5 Oct 2017</a>) as the multicol specification no longer introduces these properties. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1966">Editorial</a></li>
17321712
<li>Changed how we reference the element we have applied multicol to from multi-column or multicol <em>element</em> to multi-column or multicol <em>container</em>. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1965">Resolved: 22 November 2017</a></li>
17331713
<li>Removed the example which stated "If a tall image is moved to a column on the next page to find room for it, its natural column may be left empty. If so, the column is still considered to have content for the purpose of deciding if the column rule should be drawn." <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1740">Resolved: 7 September 2017</a></li>
17341714
</ul>

‎css-multicol-1/issues-2011.txt‎

Lines changed: 16 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -251,3 +251,19 @@ Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0057.html
251251
Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0269.html
252252
Closed: Accepted
253253
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0471.html
254+
----
255+
Issue 29.
256+
From: Rachel Andrew
257+
Summary: Should reference to breaking values be removed from the introduction?
258+
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1966
259+
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1966#issuecomment-343537878
260+
Closed: Accepted
261+
Resolved: Editorial
262+
----
263+
Issue 30
264+
From: Rachel Andrew
265+
Summary: Referring to the multicol element or container
266+
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1965
267+
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1965#issuecomment-343698710
268+
Closed: Accepted
269+
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1965#issuecomment-346424523

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)