@@ -1372,10 +1372,10 @@ Reordering and Accessibility</h4>
1372
1372
This section does not preclude respecting the 'order' property
1373
1373
when determining element ordering in such spatial navigation modes;
1374
1374
indeed it would need to be considered for such a feature to work.
1375
- However a UA that uses 'order' in determining sequential navigation,
1376
- but does not otherwise account for spatial relationships among elements
1377
- (as expressed by the various layout features of CSS including and not limited to flex layout),
1378
- is non-conforming .
1375
+ But 'order' is not the only (or even the primary) CSS property
1376
+ that would need to be considered for such a spatial navigation feature.
1377
+ A well-implemented spatial navigation feature would need to consider
1378
+ all the layout features of CSS that modify spatial relationships .
1379
1379
1380
1380
<!--
1381
1381
████████ ██ ████████ ██ ██ ██ ████ ██ ██ ████████ ██████
@@ -3475,6 +3475,24 @@ Clarifications</h4>
3475
3475
<li> Made sure that <a>main size</a> and <a>cross size</a> are defined
3476
3476
for <a>flex containers</a> as well as for <a>flex items</a> .
3477
3477
(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981">Issue 981</a> )
3478
+ <li> Tweaked final clarifying sentence of note about spatial navigation.
3479
+ (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1677">Issue 1677</a> )
3480
+ <blockquote>
3481
+ <p class="note">
3482
+ User agents, including browsers, accessible technology, and extensions,
3483
+ may offer spatial navigation features.
3484
+ This section does not preclude respecting the 'order' property
3485
+ when determining element ordering in such spatial navigation modes;
3486
+ indeed it would need to be considered for such a feature to work.
3487
+ <del> However a UA that uses 'order' in determining sequential navigation,
3488
+ but does not otherwise account for spatial relationships among elements
3489
+ (as expressed by the various layout features of CSS including and not limited to flex layout),
3490
+ is non-conforming.</del>
3491
+ <ins> But 'order' is not the only (or even the primary) CSS property
3492
+ that would need to be considered for such a spatial navigation feature.
3493
+ A well-implemented spatial navigation feature would need to consider
3494
+ all the layout features of CSS that modify spatial relationships.</ins>
3495
+ </blockquote>
3478
3496
</ul>
3479
3497
3480
3498
<h3 id="changes-20160301">
0 commit comments