[css-multicol] Edit to wording in section Column Gaps and Rules closes #1739

Author: rachelandrew

css-multicol-1/Overview.bs

@@ -755,8 +755,7 @@ Column gaps and rules</h2>
 	column rule will not alter the placement of anything else. If a column
 	rule is wider than its gap, the adjacent column boxes will overlap the
 	rule, and the rule may possibly extend outside the box of the multicol
-	container. Column rules are painted in the inline content layer, but
-	below all inline content inside the multicol container. Column rules are
+	container. Column rules are painted just above the border of the multicol element. For scrollable multicol elements, note that while the border and background of the multicol element obviously aren't scrolled, the rules need to scroll along with the columns. Column rules are
 	only drawn between two columns that both have content.
 
 <h3 id='column-gap'>
@@ -1724,6 +1723,8 @@ This appendix is <em>informative</em>.
 
 <h3 id="changes-from-20171005">Changes from the <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-multicol-1-20171005/">Working Draft (WD) of 5 October 2017</a></h3>
 <ul>
+    <li>Changed the sentence <em>Column rules are painted in the inline content layer, but below all inline content inside the multicol element.</em> to <em>Column rules are painted just above the border of the multicol element. For scrollable multicol elements, note that while the border and background of the multicol element obviously aren’t scrolled, the rules need to scroll along with the columns.</em> <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1739#issuecomment-342659978">Resolved: 7 Nov 2017</a></li>
+	<li>Under section The Multi-column Model, removed two sentences <em>That is, column boxes behave like block-level, table cell, and inline-block boxes as per CSS 2.1, section 10.1, item 2 CSS21. However, column boxes do not establish block container boxes for elements with ''position: fixed or position: absolute''.</em>. THese were replaced with a clarification about the principal box and a new example showing how abspos elements refer to the multicol container. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1738#issuecomment-342661881">Resolved: 7 Nov 2017</a></li>
     <li>Removed the sentence "To indicate where column breaks should (or should not) appear, new keyword values are introduced." and following example (Example 7 in the WD published <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-multicol-1-20171005/">5 Oct 2017</a>) as the multicol specification no longer introduces these properties. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1966">Editorial</a></li>
     <li>Changed how we reference the element we have applied multicol to from multi-column or multicol <em>element</em> to multi-column or multicol <em>container</em>. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1965">Resolved: 22 November 2017</a></li>
 	<li>Removed the example which stated "If a tall image is moved to a column on the next page to find room for it, its natural column may be left empty. If so, the column is still considered to have content for the purpose of deciding if the column rule should be drawn." <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1740">Resolved: 7 September 2017</a></li>

css-multicol-1/issues-2011.txt

@@ -152,7 +152,8 @@ Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0777.html
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0241.html
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0242.html
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1739
-Open
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1739#issuecomment-342659978
 ----
 Issue 16.
 Summary:  Remove Example XVII in CR