Added Alan Gresley's suggestion to add optional bottom right corner

coordinaties to background-position and thus remove the need for
background-size.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Nov/0255.html

Author: bert-github

css3-background/Overview.src.html

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home" alt="W3C" height="48"
 width="72" name="w3cLogo"></a><a rel="in-activity" href="../../"
 class="logo"><img src="../../../Woolly/woolly-icon.png" alt="CSS
-WG"></a> <span class="id">WD-css3-background-[CDATE]</span>
+WG"></a> <span class="id">css3-background-[CDATE]</span>
 
 <h1>CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders Module</h1>
 
@@ -1105,6 +1105,13 @@ <h3>The 'background-size' property</h3>
 <p class=issue>Is it better to allow the size of the image to be
 rounded up as well as down?
 
+<p class=issue>Alan Gresley <a
+href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Nov/0255.html">
+suggested</a> dropping 'background-size' altogether and instead add
+optional bottom right coordinates to 'background-position':
+'background-position: 0 0 0 0' is the same as 'background-size: 100%'
+and 'background-position: 0 0' is the same as 'background-size: auto'.
+