[css2] Generated. Do not edit!

--HG--
extra : convert_revision : svn%3A73dc7c4b-06e6-40f3-b4f7-9ed1dbc14bfc/trunk%403195

Author: bert-github

css2/changes.html

@@ -5700,8 +5700,8 @@ <h3 id="t.9.10"><a name="q435">C.7.46 </a><a
 <dd>For inline<del>-level</del> elements this creates an override.
 For <del>block-level, table-cell, table-caption, or
 inline-block</del> <ins>block container</ins> elements this creates an
-override for inline-level descendants not within another block-level,
-table-cell, table-caption, or inline-block element. This means that
+override for inline-level descendants not within another block container
+element. This means that
 inside the element, reordering is strictly in sequence according to
 the 'direction' property; the implicit part of the bidirectional
 algorithm is ignored. This corresponds to adding a LRO (U+202D; for
@@ -5900,7 +5900,7 @@ <h3 id="t.10.7"><a name="q445">C.7.56 </a><a
 
 <blockquote>
 <p><ins>In CSS&nbsp;2.1, the effect of 'min-height' and 'max-height'
-on table cells, table rows, and row groups is undefined.</ins>
+on tables, inline tables, table cells, table rows, and row groups is undefined.</ins>
 </blockquote>
 
 
@@ -8139,11 +8139,12 @@ <h3 id=u.10.3.2a><a name="q544">C.8.50 </a><a
 <blockquote>
 <p>If 'height' and 'width' both have computed values of 'auto' and the
 element has an intrinsic ratio but no intrinsic height or width,
-<del>and the containing block's width does not itself depend on the
+<del>and</del> <ins>then the used value of 'width' is
+undefined in CSS&nbsp;2.1. However, it is suggested that, if</ins>
+the containing block's width does not itself depend on the
 replaced element's width, then the used value of 'width' is calculated
 from the constraint equation used for block-level, non-replaced
-elements in normal flow</del> <ins>then the used value of 'width' is
-undefined in CSS&nbsp;2.1</ins>.
+elements in normal flow.
 </blockquote>
 
 

css2/diffs-rec/changes.html

@@ -5700,8 +5700,8 @@ <h3 id="t.9.10"><a name="q435"><ins>C.7.46</ins> </a><a
 <dd><ins>For inline</ins><del><ins>-level</ins></del> <ins>elements this creates an override.
 For</ins> <del><ins>block-level, table-cell, table-caption, or
 inline-block</ins></del> <ins><ins>block container</ins> elements this creates an
-override for inline-level descendants not within another block-level,
-table-cell, table-caption, or inline-block element. This means that
+override for inline-level descendants not within another block container
+element. This means that
 inside the element, reordering is strictly in sequence according to
 the 'direction' property; the implicit part of the bidirectional
 algorithm is ignored. This corresponds to adding a LRO (U+202D; for
@@ -5900,7 +5900,7 @@ <h3 id="t.10.7"><a name="q445"><ins>C.7.56</ins> </a><a
 
 <blockquote>
 <p><ins><ins>In CSS&nbsp;2.1, the effect of 'min-height' and 'max-height'
-on table cells, table rows, and row groups is undefined.</ins></ins>
+on tables, inline tables, table cells, table rows, and row groups is undefined.</ins></ins>
 </blockquote>
 
 
@@ -8119,11 +8119,11 @@ <h3 id=u.6.1.2><a name="q543"><ins>C.8.49</ins> </a><a
 <blockquote>
 <p><ins>Each property may also</ins> have a <del> <del>different meaning when interpreted as</del><ins>specified</ins></del>
 <ins><ins>cascaded</ins> value of 'inherit', which means that, for</ins> a  <del>CSS2 style sheet. Most changes are due to implementation experience feeding back into</del><ins>given
-element,</ins> the  <del>specification, but there are also some error corrections.</del><ins>property takes</ins> the  <del>meaning</del><ins>same</ins> <del><ins>computed</ins></del>
+element,</ins> the  <del>specification, but there are</del><ins>property takes the same</ins> <del><ins>computed</ins></del>
 <ins><ins>specified</ins> value as the property for the element's
 parent. The 'inherit' value can be used to</ins> <del><ins>strengthen
-inherited</ins></del> <ins><ins>enforce inheritance</ins> of</ins>  <del>"!important" has been changed. In CSS1, "!important" in an author's style sheet took precedence over one in a user style sheet. This has been reversed in CSS2. In CSS2 color values</del><ins>values, and it can
-also be used on properties that</ins> are  <del>clipped with regard to the device gamut,</del>not <ins>normally inherited.</ins>
+inherited</ins></del> <ins><ins>enforce inheritance of</ins> values, and it can</ins>
+also  <del>some error corrections.</del><ins>be used on properties that are not normally inherited.</ins>
 </blockquote>
 
 
@@ -8132,18 +8132,19 @@ <h3 id=u.10.3.2a><a name="q544"><ins>C.8.50</ins> </a><a
 href="/TR/2010/WD-CSS2-20101207/visudet.html#inline-replaced-width"><ins>10.3.2
 Inline, replaced elements</ins></a></h3>
 
-<p><ins>Because of lack of implementations, the width of a replaced element</ins>
-with  <del>regard to the sRGB gamut as in CSS1. CSS1 simply said that 'margin-right' was ignored</del><ins>an intrinsic ratio but neither intrinsic with nor intrinsic
+<p><ins>Because of lack of implementations,</ins> the  <del>meaning</del><ins>width</ins> of  <del>"!important" has been changed. In CSS1, "!important" in an author's style sheet took precedence over one in</del>a  <del>user style sheet. This has been reversed in CSS2. In CSS2 color values are clipped</del><ins>replaced element</ins>
+with  <del>regard to the device gamut, not</del><ins>an intrinsic ratio but neither intrinsic</ins> with  <del>regard to the sRGB gamut as in CSS1. CSS1 simply said that 'margin-right' was ignored</del><ins>nor intrinsic
 height is left undefined:</ins>
 
 <blockquote>
 <p>If  <del>the both 'margin-left'</del><ins>'height'</ins> and 'width'  <del>were set. In CSS2</del><ins>both have computed values of 'auto' and</ins> the
- <del>choice between relaxing 'margin-right'</del><ins>element has an intrinsic ratio but no intrinsic height</ins> or  <del>'margin-left' depends</del><ins>width,</ins>
-<del><ins>and the containing block's width does not itself depend</ins> on the
- <del>writing direction. In CSS1, several properties (e.g., 'padding') had values referring to</del><ins>replaced element's width, then</ins> the  <del>width</del><ins>used value</ins> of <ins>'width' is calculated
-from</ins> the  <del>parent element. This was an error;</del><ins>constraint equation used for block-level, non-replaced
-elements in normal flow</ins></del> <ins><ins>then</ins> the <ins>used</ins> value  <del>should always refer</del><ins>of 'width' is
-undefined in CSS&nbsp;2.1</ins>.</ins>
+ <del>choice between relaxing 'margin-right'</del><ins>element has an intrinsic ratio but no intrinsic height</ins> or  <del>'margin-left' depends on</del><ins>width,</ins>
+<del><ins>and</ins></del> <ins><ins>then</ins> the  <del>writing direction.</del><ins>used value of 'width' is
+undefined</ins> in  <del>CSS1, several properties (e.g., 'padding') had values referring to</del><ins>CSS&nbsp;2.1. However, it is suggested that, if</ins></ins>
+the <ins>containing block's</ins> width  <del>of</del><ins>does not itself depend on</ins> the
+ <del>parent element. This was an error;</del><ins>replaced element's width, then</ins> the <ins>used</ins> value  <del>should always refer</del><ins>of 'width' is calculated
+from the constraint equation used for block-level, non-replaced
+elements in normal flow.</ins>
 </blockquote>
 
 

css2/diffs-rec/grammar.html

@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ <h2> <del>D.2</del><ins>G.2</ins> <a name="scanner">Lexical scanner</a></h2>
 %option case-insensitive
 
 h		[0-9a-f]
-nonascii	[\200-\377]
+nonascii	 <del>[\200-\377]</del><ins>[\240-\377]</ins>
 unicode		 <del>\\{h}{1,6}[ \t\r\n\f]?</del><ins>\\{h}{1,6}(\r\n|[ \t\r\n\f])?</ins>
 escape		 <del>{unicode}|\\[ -~\200-\377]</del><ins>{unicode}|\\[^\r\n\f0-9a-f]</ins>
 nmstart		 <del>[a-z]|{nonascii}|{escape}</del><ins>[_a-z]|{nonascii}|{escape}</ins>