[css2] Update the list for some things at the end of August and the start of September. Much more to come still.

--HG--
extra : convert_revision : svn%3A73dc7c4b-06e6-40f3-b4f7-9ed1dbc14bfc/trunk%402371

Author: Hixie

css2/issues/issues-3

@@ -1301,7 +1301,8 @@ collapsing border model earlier in the spec (17.5.1).
 
 -Michael
 
-Resolution: Keep definiton of 'empty-cells' as is (i.e., doesn't apply to
+Resolution:
+Keep definiton of 'empty-cells' as is (i.e., doesn't apply to
 collapsed borders).
 
 =Elika= to propose a new example for 17.5.1. (Waiting for issue 127.)
@@ -1414,7 +1415,8 @@ overflow, ..."
 
 -Markus
 
-Resolution: accepted
+Resolution:
+accepted
 
 =Tantek= Edit
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1525,7 +1527,8 @@ Does 'table-caption' introduce a new block formatting context?
 
 Proposal: Yes. Add them to 9.4.1.
 
-Resolution: accepted
+Resolution:
+accepted
 
 =Tantek= Edit
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1600,7 +1603,8 @@ the spec is saying what it wants to be saying).
 
 -Boris
 
-Resolution: accepted
+Resolution:
+accepted
 
 =H�kon= Discuss
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1614,7 +1618,8 @@ has not changed since the old CR.
 
 -Geoff
 
-Resolution: Leave example, but David to write an extra example.
+Resolution:
+Leave example, but David to write an extra example.
 
 =David= Propose additional example.
 =H�kon= Edit
@@ -1672,7 +1677,8 @@ language and we do discuss :lang() with no language. Seems they either
 missed that or they want that :lang() is not undefined in CSS 2.1.
 -Bjoern
 
-Resolution: :lang() (no argument) is a syntax error and causes the rule
+Resolution:
+:lang() (no argument) is a syntax error and causes the rule
 to be ignored.  Change
   Exception: C may be empty, but it is undefined in CSS 2.1 what it
   matches in that case. (This is likely to be defined in CSS level 3.)
@@ -2100,6 +2106,8 @@ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0401.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0422.html
 URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0401.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0422.html
+URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0425.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Oct/0122.html
 Description:
 Subject: [CSS21] Examples
 From Chris on behalf of SVG and CDF.
@@ -2342,11 +2350,16 @@ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0390.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0392.html
 URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0397.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0420.html
+URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/43156D79.1070402@disruptive-innovations.com
+URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/438E77CE.7010107@inkedblade.net
+URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0427.html
 Description:
 Subject: Re: [CSS21] Unclear status of different versions
 From Chris on behalf of SVG and CDF.
-Awaiting further reply.
-Issue closed.
+
+=WG= Discuss. Do we rescind CSS2? If not, what do we do about the fact
+that we have decided CSS2 is wrong on a huge number of issues?
+
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Issue 117.
 URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/265287321.20050825153955@w3.org
@@ -2357,6 +2370,8 @@ Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0383.html
 URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0385.html (no request)
 URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0388.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0413.html
+URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0424.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Oct/0121.html
 Description:
 Subject: Re: [CSS21] Unclear applicability to XML
 From Chris on behalf of SVG and CDF.
@@ -2412,6 +2427,8 @@ URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/1341229462.20050829170955@w3.org
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0387.html
 URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0389.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0417.html
+URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0428.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Oct/0124.html
 Description:
 Subject: [CSS21] Projected deprecation
 Resolution:
@@ -2433,6 +2450,8 @@ URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/922544614.20050825155235@w3.org
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0373.html
 URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0398.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0421.html
+URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0426.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Oct/0123.html
 Description:
 Subject: Re: [CSS21] Style sheet definition
 From Chris on behalf of SVG and CDF.
@@ -2500,11 +2519,10 @@ inside an @media block. Oops.)
 
 =WG= Discuss.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Issue 127
+Issue 127.
+URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/43496FF1.6030306@inkedblade.net
 Description:
 
-http://www.w3.org/mid/43496FF1.6030306@inkedblade.net
-
 (See also empty-cells in issue 62)
 
 http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#table-layers
@@ -2526,8 +2544,34 @@ separated borders model. It's also compatible with what I
 perceive to be CSS2's take on the problem. (See the last
 rule in 17.5.1 in CSS2.)
 
-- Elika
+-Elika
 
 =WG= Discuss.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
+Issue 128.
+URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/4315C787.6030203@comhem.se
+Description:
+shrink-to-fit issue.
+=WG= Discuss.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
+Issue 129.
+URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/43187BCC.3050109@easyconnect.fr
+Description:
+error handling of selectors
+=WG= Discuss.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
+Issue 130.
+URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2005JulSep/0196.html
+Description:
+Some things in 4.1.1 still say [a-zA-Z].
+=WG= Discuss.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
+Issue 131.
+URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/e474a6b0ffb3c208411115775fe0b074@asahi-net.or.jp
+Description:
+Request to change a graphic.
+Resolution:
+Assumed editorial by Ian.
+=Bert= Examine.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------