[css-transforms] Compile DoC: Bugzilla & GitHub through today, www-style TBC

fantasai · fantasai · commit b1227335630f · 2016-12-29T19:05:19.000+03:30
diff --git a/css-transforms-2/issues-wd-2013.txt b/css-transforms-2/issues-wd-2013.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+Draft:    https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-transforms-1-20131126/
+Title:    CSS Transforms Level 2
+
+3D Transforms Included (moved from L1 per WG resolution)
+
+current through 2016/12/29 but missing www-style input
+
+----
+Issue 1.
+Summary:  [summary]
+From:     [name]
+Comment:  [url]
+Response: [url]
+Changes:  [changeset(s) or new section or left blank for “It's complicated.” ]
+Closed:   Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted/Deferred ... or replace this line with "Open"
+Verified: [url]
+Resolved: Editorial/Bugfix (for obvious fixes)/Editor discretion/[url to minutes]
+----
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Define exactly how to apply perspective (w-parameter)
+From:     Aryeh Gregor
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15605
+Response:
+Open:     =WG= Do something.
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  “accumulated 3D transformation matrix” is misleading
+From:     Dean Jackson
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17433
+Response:
+Open:     =dino= Propose edits.
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  transform-style doesn't define keywords
+From:     Dirk Schulze
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22427
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Edit
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Can't test backface-visibility
+From:     Shawn Singh
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23014
+Response:
+Open:     =WG= Discuss for ideas or close no action.
+Resolved:
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Clarify interaction of preserve-3d and backface-visibility
+From:     Shawn Singh
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23015
+Response:
+Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Overflow clipping should not always create stacking context
+From:     Tien-Ren Chen
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28252
+Response:
+Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Clarify normalization to unit vector for rotate3d
+From:     Mike Taylor
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29417
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Edit
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Undefined variable in matrix decomposition formula
+From:     Manish Goregaokar
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29815
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Edit
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Specs disagree on whether perspective-origin's resolved value is used or computed
+From:     Xidorn Quan (usurper)
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/392
+Proposal: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/392#issuecomment-269639534
+Response:
+Changes:
+Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+Resolved:
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  opacity flattening is unwelcome
+From:     Joseph Orbegoso Pea (trusktr)
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/496
+Response:
+Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+Resolved:
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Bugs in interpolation algorithm
+From:     Manish Goregaokar (Manishearth)
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/483#issuecomment-249497761
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Edit or ask for help.
+Resolved: Bugfix.
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Expand transform-origin to take a list
+From:     Sebastian Zartner (SebastianZ)
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/589
+Response:
+Open:     =WG= Dicuss.
+Resolved:
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  perspective(0) violates open range restriction
+From:     Xidorn Quan
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/413
+Response:
+Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+Resolved:
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  transform properties should restrict application
+From:     Matt Rakow (ChumpChief)
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/260
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/260#issuecomment-230065135
+Open:     =Tab= Edit.
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
diff --git a/css-transforms/issues-wd-2013.txt b/css-transforms/issues-wd-2013.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+Draft:    https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-transforms-1-20131126/
+Title:    CSS Transforms Level 1
+
+2D Transforms Only (3D Transforms move to L2 per WG resolution)
+
+----
+Issue 1.
+Summary:  [summary]
+From:     [name]
+Comment:  [url]
+Response: [url]
+Changes:  [changeset(s) or new section or left blank for “It's complicated.” ]
+Closed:   Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted/Deferred ... or replace this line with "Open"
+Verified: [url]
+Resolved: Editorial/Bugfix (for obvious fixes)/Editor discretion/[url to minutes]
+----
+
+
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Use of “containing block” does not match CSS2.1 definition
+From:     Aryeh Gregor
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16328
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Figure out what to do.
+Resolved:
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Add more info to “Module Interactions”
+From:     Dirk Schulze
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17237
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Edit.
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Clarify behavior for gradientTransform and patternTransform
+From:     Erik Dahlström
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
+Response:
+Open:     =Dirk= Deal. or =WG= Discuss.
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Use UA style sheet instead of prose for SVG transform-origin
+From:     Dirk Schulze
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28000
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Edit.
+Resolved: Editor discretion
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Match SVG spec for interaction with object bounding box units
+From:     Amelia Bellamy-Royds
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28385
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Edit.
+Resolved: Editor discretion.
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Error order of multiple transform function
+From:     rosenau
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29110
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Edit.
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Unitless zero rotation
+From:     Simon Fraser
+Comment:  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29413
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Update to reference CSS Values 3 correctly?
+Resolved: [Sydney F2F 2016?]
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Use 'will-change' to optimize rasterization
+From:     chrishtr
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/236
+Response:
+Changes:
+Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+Resolved:
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Update “transformable elements” for SVG2
+From:     Nikos Andronikos
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/358
+Response:
+Changes:
+Open:     =Tab= Edit
+Resolved: Editor discretion
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Specs disagree on whether transform-origin's resolvd value is used or computed
+From:     Xidorn Quan
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/392#issuecomment-238494067
+Proposal: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/392#issuecomment-269639534
+Response:
+Changes:
+Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+Resolved:
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Issues list link is outdated
+From:     Rick Byers
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/486
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Edit.
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Bugs in interpolation algorithm
+From:     Manish Goregaokar (Manishearth)
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/483#issuecomment-249497761
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Edit or ask for help.
+Resolved: Bugfix.
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Convert to <*-percentage> notation
+From:     Sebastian Zartner (SebastianZ)
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/645
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Edit.
+Resolved: Editorial.
+----
+Issue .
+Summary:  Some cubic-bezier functions output out of range [0,1]
+From:     hiikezoe
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/744
+Response:
+Open:     =Tab= Solve or agenda+.
+Resolved:
+----
