[css-counter-styles] Updated issues list.

Author: tabatkins

css-counter-styles/issues-lc-20130718.html

@@ -216,3 +216,27 @@ <h1>CSS Counter Styles Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2013-07-18 LCWD</h1>
 Response: <a href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0710.html'>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0710.html</a>
 Closed:   Rejected
 Verified:</pre>
+<pre class='a' id='issue-26'>
+Issue 26. <a href='#issue-26'>#</a>
+Summary:  'cjk-decimal' style shouldn't be defined for negatives, as there's no common negative sign.
+From:     Xidorn Quan
+Comment:  <a href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0001.html'>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0001.html</a>
+Comment:  <a href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0026.html'>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0026.html</a>
+Response: <a href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0031.html'>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0031.html</a>
+Closed:   Accepted</pre>
+<pre class='a' id='issue-27'>
+Issue 27. <a href='#issue-27'>#</a>
+Summary:  It's not defined what to do if an unknown counter-style name is used in counter()/etc
+From:     Simon Sapin
+Comment:  <a href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0178.html'>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0178.html</a>
+Comment:  <a href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0179.html'>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0179.html</a>
+Response: <a href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0200.html'>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0200.html</a>
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: <a href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0201.html'>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0201.html</a></pre>
+<pre class='a' id='issue-28'>
+Issue 28. <a href='#issue-28'>#</a>
+Summary:  Impls should be allowed to go past the complex CJK limits
+From:     Xidorn Quan
+Comment:  <a href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0139.html'>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0139.html</a>
+Response: <a href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0204.html'>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0204.html</a>
+Closed:   Accepted</pre>

css-counter-styles/issues-lc-20130718.txt

@@ -193,6 +193,23 @@ Issue 26.
 Summary:  'cjk-decimal' style shouldn't be defined for negatives, as there's no common negative sign.
 From:     Xidorn Quan
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0001.html
-Response:
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0026.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0031.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+----
+Issue 27.
+Summary:  It's not defined what to do if an unknown counter-style name is used in counter()/etc
+From:     Simon Sapin
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0178.html
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0179.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0200.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0201.html
+----
+Issue 28.
+Summary:  Impls should be allowed to go past the complex CJK limits
+From:     Xidorn Quan
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0139.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0204.html
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----