[css-display] Update DoC

Author: fantasai

css-display/issues-wd-2017.bsi

@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0155.html
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610#issuecomment-274911199
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0065.html
-Closed:   Rejected
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0066.html
+Closed:   Deferred to HTML https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2291
 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
 ----
 Issue 3.
@@ -30,14 +31,6 @@ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
 Closed:   Accepted
 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html
 ----
-Issue 4.
-Summary:  Clarify interaction of 'display: contents' with HTML rules
-From:     Boris Zbarsky
-Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0077.html
-Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0077.html
-Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0083.html
-Closed:   Accepted
-----
 Issue 5.
 Summary:  Interaction of run-in and ::first-letter
 From:     Florian Rivoal
@@ -68,7 +61,7 @@ Summary:  Define interaction of 'display: contents' and replaced elements
 From:     Simon Pieters
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540#issuecomment-285214950
-Open:     =WG= Discuss follow-up issue wrt object fallback
+Closed:   Accepted
 Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sQbKYcM6mmRueGJBozPGer_UwQDMyv+eww3kOBAHC7mg@mail.gmail.com
 -----
 Issue 9.
@@ -148,36 +141,347 @@ Summary:  What are form controls?
 From:     Boris Zbarsky
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024#issuecomment-285215276
-Open:     Accepted, pending verification
+Closed:   Accepted
 Resolved: Editor discretion
 ----
 Issue 19.
 Summary:  Anonymous boxes inheriting from `display: contents`
-From:     loirooriol
+From:     Oriol, Boris Zbarsky
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118
-Open
-Resolved: =WG= Discuss.
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1249
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301942276
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301953751
 ----
 Issue 20.
 Summary:  Propagation of text-decoration applied to `display: contents`
-From:     loirooriol
+From:     Oriol
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136
-Open:     =TF= Clarify somewhere
-Resolved:
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136#issuecomment-301938274
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9a8bdda32c4d22a2cbc98d6c3724b72f651b6b3
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html
 ----
 Issue 21.
 Summary:  `display: block` seems to define flex and grid items as block-level
-From:     loirooriol
+From:     Oriol
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292656095
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292738919
+Response:
 Closed:   Accepted
 Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 22.
 Summary:  Display erroneously groups ruby with atomic inlines
-From:     loirooriol
-Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180#issuecomment-292638199
 Closed:   Accepted
 Resolved: Bugfix
 ----
+Issue 23.
+Summary:  Block containers can also establish an inline formatting context
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301622704
+Cloed:    Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301630234
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-314583112
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 24.
+Summary:  Revisions to *-level definitions
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294637052
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294646968
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-301623329
+Closed:   Invalid
+----
+Issue 25.
+Summary:  Do table captions participate in BFC or TFC?
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189#issuecomment-301626461
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 26.
+Summary:  Table contins invalid values
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225#issuecomment-301631015
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 27.
+Summary:  list-item definition implies invalid keyword combos are valid
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226#issuecomment-301631288
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 28.
+Summary:  Do contents and none have outer display type?
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227#issuecomment-301631748
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 29.
+Summary:  Run-in erroneously excludes blocks that establish inline formatting context
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228#issuecomment-301632605
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2f6354014360662e2aef0e25da433852d4fa8b3a
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 30.
+Summary:  Blockification rules not backwards-compatible for inline-block
+From:     Boris Zbarsky
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-301634850
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-305246779
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-313211986
+Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+----
+Issue 31.
+Summary:  Rename “block container” to “flow container”
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301635795
+Closed:   Rejected
+Resolved: Editor discretion
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301639507
+----
+Issue 32.
+Summary:  Text nodes vs text runs
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281#issuecomment-301942809
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html
+----
+Issue 33.
+Summary:  Inheritance with 'display: contents' and ::first-line
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310
+Response:
+Open
+----
+Issue 34.
+Summary:  Define 'display: contents' as a type of box
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299120942
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299247618
+Closed:   Retracted
+----
+Issue 35.
+Summary:  Define more sensible blockification for layout-internal types
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340#issuecomment-301641681
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5aaca4a7030e818cd02ac2d93137e1cd1d295bae
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editor discretion
+----
+Issue 36.
+Summary:  Inlinification, recursion, and ruby vs display definitions
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301643296
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301944521
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-313204672
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html
+----
+Issue 37.
+Summary:  Does display: contents apply to ::before ::after
+From:     Emilio
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345#issuecomment-313205067
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html
+----
+Issue 38.
+Summary:  Define interaction of various box tree fixups
+From:     Boris Zbarsky
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301878155
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301888405
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302250667
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302748058
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f5b79e99bb8fc9ebea4ed956ed3420bc69b90786
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 39.
+Summary:  Root inline box vs anonymous inline boxes
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301832460
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301833956
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301872204
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6aeeabe060c8d8c1397ef2196a4e3a62da964d5e
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 40.
+Summary:  Inlinification by display type or anon box fixup?
+From:     fantasai
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390#issuecomment-313211238
+Closed:   Retracted
+----
+Issue 41.
+Summary:  Computation of 'float' vs 'position' without a box
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436#issuecomment-313215820
+Open
+----
+Issue 42.
+Summary:  Are run-in contents inside ::first-line?
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313246128
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editor discretion
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313249402
+----
+Issue 43.
+Summary:  “Becoming a formatting context” section is a mess
+From:     Oriol, fantasai
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457#issuecomment-313225448
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563
+Open
+----
+Issue 44.
+Summary:  Is 'position: marker' out-of-flow?
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458#issuecomment-313224602
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 45.
+Summary:  Does run-in algo recurse?
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460#issuecomment-314593762
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c9f1bb16d0e5077b9bca7027a7d7252eeff5abf1
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 46.
+Summary:  Parallel construction should be pairwise disjoint (editorial)
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1470
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/09212af80e10e4e3e57965bb27b2de3fdcd86e06
+Closed:   Fixed
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 47.
+Summary:  BFC definition not quite right
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313240736
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313247457
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313263022
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313252408
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313266528
+Open
+----
+Issue 48.
+Summary:  Run-in fixup vs block-in-inline fixup
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472#issuecomment-313242917
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 49.
+Summary:  Note wrt inheritance of ::first-line through 'display: contents'.
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473#issuecomment-313247421
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 50.
+Summary:  Display types: on elements or on boxes?
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314569164
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314583675
+----
+Issue 51.
+Summary:  Should 'inline-foo' and 'inline foo' be distinct?
+From:     David Baron
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486
+Open
+----
+Issue 52.
+Summary:  At-risk list omits three-component values
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1490
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/394c62f72fda4ac824c9ce204a99bf991b9e6471
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 53.
+Summary:  Discrepencies in run-in
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491#issuecomment-314570280
+----
+Issue 54.
+Summary:  Serialization of list-item values not listed
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493#issuecomment-314572350
+Closed:   OutOfScope (to CSSOM) / Rejected (for editorial)
+Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial
+----
+Issue 55.
+Summary:  Missing definition of 'inline-list-item'
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495#issuecomment-306282449
+Open
+----
+Issue 56.
+Summary:  Redesign 'flow-root' keyword and related features
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496
+Open
+----
+Issue 57.
+Summary:  Inlinification doesn't inlinify layout-internal boxes
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582
+Response:
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 58.
+Summary:  <legend> with no box example is confusing
+From:     Oriol
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494427
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494885
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313498359
+Open
+Resolved: Editorial
+----