[css-counter-styles] Make cjk-decimal only defined for non-negative values, as there's no common negative sign among the languages that fallback to it.

Author: tabatkins

css-counter-styles/Overview.bs

@@ -1119,6 +1119,7 @@ Numeric: ''decimal'', ''decimal-leading-zero'', ''cjk-decimal'', ''lower-roman''
 
 	@counter-style cjk-decimal {
 		system: numeric;
+		range: 0 infinity;
 		symbols: \3007  \4E00  \4E8C  \4E09  \56DB  \4E94  \516D  \4E03  \516B  \4E5D;
 		/* 〇 一 二 三 四 五 六 七 八 九 */
 		suffix: '\3001';

css-counter-styles/Overview.html

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
 </p>
   <h1 class="p-name no-ref" id=title>CSS Counter Styles Level 3</h1>
   <h2 class="no-num no-toc no-ref heading settled heading" id=subtitle><span class=content>Editor’s Draft,
-    <span class=dt-updated><span class=value-title title=20140225>25 February 2014</span></span></span></h2>
+    <span class=dt-updated><span class=value-title title=20140304>4 March 2014</span></span></span></h2>
   <div data-fill-with=spec-metadata><dl><dt>This version:<dd><a class=u-url href=http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/>http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/</a><dt>Latest version:<dd><a href=http://w3.org/TR/css-counter-styles-3/>http://w3.org/TR/css-counter-styles-3/</a><dt>Editor’s Draft:<dd><a href=http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/>http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/</a><dt>Previous Versions:<dd><a href=http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css-counter-styles-3-20121009/ rel=previous>http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css-counter-styles-3-20121009/</a>
     <dt>Feedback:</dt>
         <dd><a href="mailto:www-style@w3.org?subject=%5Bcss-counter-styles%5D%20feedback">www-style@w3.org</a>
@@ -1153,6 +1153,7 @@ <h3 class="heading settled heading" data-level=6.1 id=simple-numeric><span class
 
 @counter-style cjk-decimal {
   system: numeric;
+  range: 0 infinity;
   symbols: \3007  \4E00  \4E8C  \4E09  \56DB  \4E94  \516D  \4E03  \516B  \4E5D;
   /* 〇 一 二 三 四 五 六 七 八 九 */
   suffix: '\3001';

css-counter-styles/issues-lc-20130718.txt

@@ -189,3 +189,10 @@ Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0710.html
 Closed:   Rejected
 Verified:
 ----
+Issue 26.
+Summary:  'cjk-decimal' style shouldn't be defined for negatives, as there's no common negative sign.
+From:     Xidorn Quan
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0001.html
+Response:
+Closed:   Accepted
+----