[css-flexbox] Add DoC

Author: fantasai

bin/issuegen.pl

@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
   s/(http\S+)/<a href='\1'>\1<\/a>/g;
 
   # Anchor issue number
-  s/Issue (\d+)\./Issue \1. <a href='#issue-\1'>#<\/a>/;
+  s/Issue (\w+)\./Issue \1. <a href='#issue-\1'>#<\/a>/;
   my $index = $1;
 
   # Color coding WG response

css-flexbox/issues-cr-20160526.bsi

@@ -0,0 +1,250 @@
+
+Draft:    https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-flexbox-1-20160526/
+Title:    CSS Flexible Box Layout
+Issues:   https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/labels/css-flexbox-1
+
+----
+Issue 1.
+Summary:  Scrollable oveflow vs alignment
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0107.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0109.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Notes:    Fixed in css-align-3
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ea5c14795ccf05786ab1b1c45e80d7c9d4841bdf
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 2.
+Summary:  Add property for switching keyboarding order DOM vs flex order
+From:     Léonie Watson
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0119.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0123.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0124.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0125.html
+Open:     Rejected
+Notes:    See previous discussions on a11y vs layout reordering and
+          https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#flow-order
+          https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#order-accessibility
+Resolved: =WG= Discuss.
+----
+Issue 3.
+Summary:  min-height vs border-box sizing
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0163.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0164.html
+Closed:   Invalid
+Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0173.html
+----
+Issue 4.
+Summary:  Add justify-content: space-evenly
+From:     Bejamin Strauß
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jul/0034.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jul/0035.html
+Closed:   Out-of-scope
+Notes:    Already added through CSS Box Alignment module.
+----
+Issue 5.
+Summary:  Percentage margins for intrinsic sizing
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jul/0061.html
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/359 (duped to 347)
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/347
+Response: 
+Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+----
+Issue 6.
+Summary:  Definiteness of flex items’ main size depending on flex-basis
+From:     Geoffrey Sneddon
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0068.html
+Response: 
+Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+----
+Issue 7.
+Summary:  Spec lists incorrect initial value for 'flex'
+From:     xgq frms
+From:     philix
+From:     raphaelgoetter
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0030.html
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/183
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/634
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0034.html
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/183#issuecomment-227652791
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/634#issuecomment-255542169
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+Notes:    =TF= Follow up to OP once update hits /TR
+----
+Issue 8.
+Summary:  Flexbox spec currently has "Printer" as its title
+From:     dholbert
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/182
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/182#issuecomment-225712448
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 9.
+Summary:  block-axis baselines
+From:     Mats Palmgren
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/197
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/197#issuecomment-248331296
+Closed:   Rejected
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0076.html
+----
+Issue 10.
+Summary:  More precise definition of baseline-alignment sizing impact
+From:     François Remy
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/372
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/372#issuecomment-237375117
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/372#issuecomment-237377783
+----
+Issue 11.
+Summary:  Intrinsic Sizing Algo forgets to clamp by min size
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/361
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/361#issuecomment-280448350
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+Verified: =biesi= Review.
+----
+Issue 12.
+Summary:  'auto' keyword missing from flex-basis
+From:     p2227
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/329
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/329#issuecomment-233586411
+Closed:   Invalid
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/329#event-728412033
+----
+Issue 13.
+Summary:  baseline-alignment fallback should be start not flex-start
+From:     fantasai
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/332
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/332#issuecomment-277107165
+Closed:   Invalid
+Verified: reporter is editor
+----
+Issue 14.
+Summary:  Error in axis-mapping table
+From:     funorpain
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/205
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/29e6b0adab5cc559202f7fd321c620b17e6046b1
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 15.
+Summary:  Absolute ratio flex impossible with margins/padding
+From:     fantasai
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/316
+Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+----
+Issue 16A.
+Summary:  Baselines of empty boxes and other cases of baseline synthesis
+From:     François Remy
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/373
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/373#issuecomment-242863486
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/373#issuecomment-244829198
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0000.html
+----
+Issue 16B.
+Summary:  Baselines of empty boxes
+From:     fantasai
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/439
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/439#issuecomment-246571933
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0028.html
+----
+Issue 17.
+Summary:  Error in example: s/align-content/align-self/
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/436
+Closed:   Accepted
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/e377000a95363800f3d945358aee80eea2daade6
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 18.
+Summary:  Static position not following hypothetical position loses use cases
+From:     jlukic
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/401
+Open:     =WG= Discuss.
+----
+Issue 19A.
+Summary:  Computing out align-self auto is problematic
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-244791183
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-244824005
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-247595259
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0041.html
+----
+Issue 19B.
+Summary:  Why changing static position when align-self: auto?
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-268110480
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-280459999
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0001.html
+----
+Issue 19C.
+Summary:  Ambiguous lookup for align-self: auto
+From:     Emilio
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-281680347
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-282097463
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 20.
+Summary:  Flex properties applying to table wrapper box
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/547
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/547#issuecomment-277108563
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/547#issuecomment-278414959
+From:     Florian Rivoal
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/948
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/948#issuecomment-277320547
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0046.html
+----
+Issue 21.
+Summary:  Errors in update to align-self: auto
+From:     Javier Fernandez
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/644
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 22.
+Summary:  Define 'align-content: space-between' for one line in multiline flex
+From:     markbrown
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/718
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/718#issuecomment-263037457
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 23.
+Summary:  Typo
+From:     Mats Palmgren
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/792
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/792#issuecomment-280439482
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 24.
+Summary:  Missing terminology definitions for flex container axes
+From:     Geoffrey Sneddon
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981#issuecomment-280451297
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981#issuecomment-280456508
+----
+Issue 25.
+Summary:  Baseline alignment using visual or logical “first” item?
+From:     fantasai
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995#issuecomment-281750174
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995#issuecomment-282100035
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: 
+----