Skip to content

[css-position] Should 'table-column{-group}' reference be removed from position: relative spec? #1507

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
stephenmcgruer opened this issue Jun 7, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@stephenmcgruer
Copy link
Contributor

In the CSS3 position spec, the 'position' attribute (https://www.w3.org/TR/css-position-3/#position-property or https://drafts.csswg.org/css-position/#position-property) notes that it applies to:

"all elements except table-column-group and table-column"

However later in the spec it specifies what to do for position: relative (and position: sticky, by inference) for table-column-group and table-column:

"table-column-group, table-column do not offset the respective column and has no visual affect when position: relative is applied." (https://www.w3.org/TR/css-position-3/#valdef-position-relative)

Is such a specification required, if the core 'position' attribute is not valid on elements with those display types?

@tabatkins
Copy link
Member

Done as part of the larger rewrite.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants