You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
section > div repeat(> ul > li) { /* ... */ }
which is equal to writing
section > div > ul > li,
section > div > ul > li > ul > li,
section > div > ul > li > ul > li > ul > li,
section > div > ul > li > ul > li > ul > li > ul > li,
section > div > ul > li > ul > li > ul > li > ul > li > ul > li,
... {}
The specificity would be the same of the matched "splatted" selector. Having this would solve a lot of problems derived from too generic css selectors' specificity that designers often encounter.
Would this make sense to have in your opinion?
Thank you for reading this. This is my third request in very short time, I promise I will shut up now :-P
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello,
The specificity would be the same of the matched "splatted" selector. Having this would solve a lot of problems derived from too generic css selectors' specificity that designers often encounter.
Would this make sense to have in your opinion?
Thank you for reading this. This is my third request in very short time, I promise I will shut up now :-P
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: