[css-fonts-3] Request transition to Proposed Recommendation

[svgeesus]

The Fonts 3 testsuite now shows only one failing test which is for font-feature-values. We resolved to remove that feature, deferring it to Fonts 4, which I just did. It was marked as at-risk in the March 2018 CR. I have a one-line pull request on web platform tests which updates the rel=help to point to Fonts 4 instead of Fonts 3.

Once that change is accepted there will be zero failing tests and we have met our CR exit criteria.

I would like a CSS WG resolution to request transition to Proposed Recommendation for Fonts 3.

[svgeesus]

Remaining Fonts 3 issues for Disposition of Comments deferred to Fonts 4.

[svgeesus]

Disposition of Comments

One remaining open issue, was already at-risk in CR, some uncomfortable with downgrading from must to should. No implementations.

[astearns]

(removing the Agenda+ label. We'll revisit this once the updated CR gets to the point where we can ask for PR again)

[svgeesus]

PR transition request
denied due to two small normative changes
Updated CR transition request
spec published 26 June 2018

Exclusion period ends 25 August 2018.

Expect that spec to then move to PR without any edits beyond styling/status

[xfq]

PR published. Should we close the issue?