[css-tables] column constrainedness and cell outer max-content width

[davidsgrogan]

(Stems from #2802)

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-tables-3/#outer-max-content says

• The outer max-content width of a table-cell in a non-constrained column is max(min-width, width, min-content width, min(max-width, max-content width)) adjusted by the cell intrinsic offsets.

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-tables-3/#constrainedness says

A column is constrained if its corresponding table-column-group (if any), its corresponding table-column (if any), or any of the cells spanning only that column has a computed width that is not "auto", and is not a percentage.

The constrained definition implies that if a table-cell is in a non-constrained column, it has width: auto. But then why does the outer max-content width definition pasted above include width if it's always auto? Just redundant or am I missing something, perhaps related to column spanning? In that vein, should

table-cell in a non-constrained column

be changed to

table-cell that originates in a non-constrained column

Otherwise, if the concept of in a has been defined, could that get a link to the definition?