-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 715
[meta] in speech, etc #3133
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
If so, should we add obsoletion notice to the ED and TR version of css-speech? I don't find one in them. |
css-speech is marked as retired on /TR but yes, the actual spec has no indication that it is retired. |
If you think speech should be omitted, then sure, remove "in speech" but I'd leave the rest of the sentence intact and present. It's describing the scope of intent for CSS, and it is correct in that sense. PS @svgeesus please use data to back up claims such as "little used on the open Web". I don't know how much XHTML is on the web, but I'm certain that XML is very widely used. |
I'm happy with removing ", in speech" but would like to keep the generic "structured documents" part. CSS isn't completely tied to the open web - it gets used in other places as well. |
@astearns yes, fair enough. Intranets, offline use are certainly significant uses, although it isn't clear how much CSSWG prioritises those uses compared to open web usecases. |
Given we just killed
media
spec-wide, and with CSS speech abandoned, and XML little used on the open Web, maybe we should be revising this sentence which gets auto-added to the abstract of every CSS spec?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: