[css-2025] Add specs to Rough Interoperability

[SebastianZ]

There are a bunch of specifications which might be added to the Rough Interoperability section.

CSS Nesting 1

Current status: WD (last published: 14 February 2023)
WPT: passing tests: Chrome: 88, Edge: 88, Firefox: 89, Safari: 85; interop: 84 / 89 (94.4%)
Current Snapshot section: -
Open issues: on GitHub: 23, in spec.: 2

Notes: Very high interoperability, part of interop 2024

CSS Scroll Anchoring 1

Current status: WD (last published: 11 November 2020)
WPT: passing tests (experimental): Chrome: 79, Edge: 81, Firefox: 78, Safari: 22; interop: 22 / 84 (26.2%), 76 / 84 (90.5%) for Chrome, Edge and Firefox
Current Snapshot section: -
Open issues: on GitHub: 17, in spec.: 0

Notes: high interoperability between two engines, implementations agree on main use cases

CSS Tables 3

Current status: WD (last published: 27 July 2019)
WPT: passing tests: Chrome: 982, Edge: 982, Firefox: 916, Safari: 802; interop: 740 / 1028 (72.0%)
Current Snapshot section: -
Open issues: on GitHub: 59, in spec.: 10

Notes: relatively high interoperability, though many open issues

CSS Color 5

Current status: WD (last published: 29 February 2024)
WPT: passing tests: Chrome: 9217 , Edge: 9210, Firefox: 9237, Safari: 8452 ; interop: 8412 / 8412 (100%)
Current Snapshot section: -
Open issues: on GitHub: 30, in spec.: 0

Notes: interoperability is good. Both CSS Color 5 Relative Colors and CSS Color 5 color-mix(), were cleared-to-ship pre-CR in CSS 2023. Relative Colors are part of Interop 2024. color-mix() was part of Interop 2023 in the Color Spaces and Functions focus area.

CSSOM 1

Current status: WD (last published: 26 August 2021)
WPT: passing tests: Chrome: 3745, Edge: 3745, Firefox: 3735, Safari: 3571; interop: 3511 / 3873 (90.7%)
Current Snapshot section: -
Open issues: on GitHub: 128, in spec.: 19

Notes: high interoperability, though many open issues

CSSOM View 1

Current status: WD (last published: 17 March 2016)
WPT: passing tests: Chrome: 1119, Edge: 1047, Firefox: 1140, Safari: 1064; interop: 949 / 1287 (73.7%)
Current Snapshot section: -
Open issues: on GitHub: 143, in spec.: 7

Notes: high interoperability, though many open issues

Media Queries 5

Current status: WD (last published: 18 December 2021)
WPT: passing tests: Chrome: 93, Edge: 93, Firefox: 89, Safari: 90; interop: 86 / 97 (88.7%)
Current Snapshot section: -
Open issues: on GitHub: 72, in spec.: 8

Notes: high interoperability, though many open issues, looks like WPTs for some features are missing, but some important ones are there. Though as not all features are supported by browsers, maybe only the interoperable ones should be added to Safe to Release pre-CR Exceptions.

Selectors 4

Current status: WD (last published: 11 November 2022)
WPT: passing tests (all tests, not sure how to restrict to level 4): Chrome: 4807, Edge: 4800, Firefox: 5466, Safari: 4807; interop: 4737 / 5506 (86.0%)
Current Snapshot section: features :dir(), :lang(), and :focus-within in Safe to Release pre-CR Exceptions
Open issues: on GitHub: 105, in spec.: 11

Notes: high interoperability, though many open issues, looks like WPTs for some features are missing, but some important ones are there. Though as not all features are supported by browsers, maybe only the interoperable ones should be added to Safe to Release pre-CR Exceptions.

---

Note that this issue only covers specs that should move to the Rough Interoperability section. #9770 covers the ones that should move to the Official Definition. And I'll go through all the other specs and create separate issues for the others sections if needed.

Sebastian

[SebastianZ]

I've updated the statistics for all the specs listed.

As time is passing quickly, let's add this to the agenda.

I think definite candidates for the rough interoperability are:

• CSS Nesting 1
• CSS Scoping 1
• CSS Scroll Anchoring 1
• CSS Shadow Parts 1 (though would profit from more WPTs)
• CSSOM 1

The others listed above need more debate. (See the notes I've added.)

Sebastian

[svgeesus]

@SebastianZ to keep things together, is it okay for me to edit your first comment to add other specs?

[SebastianZ]

@svgeesus Yes, of course!

[svgeesus]

Thanks! I added CSS Color 5 which is still a WD, but major parts are cleared for pre-CR, and also formed part of Interop 2023 and 2024. However, we have other specs in the rough interop area that are also WD.

[SelenIT]

Speaking of Selectors, maybe at least :not() with a selector list can be Safe to Release pre-CR Exception too?

[SebastianZ]

I am currently working on a separate "Safe to Release pre-CR Exception" issue, in which such exceptions will be listed.

Though I wonder whether explicitly listing :not() with a selector list there brings additional benefit if Selectors 4 already gets listed under "Rough Interoperability".
I mean, yes, that indicates that the working group ensures that the specification of the feature is stable enough to be released, though rough interoperability between engines also indicates that.

Sebastian

[SebastianZ]

I was just wondering if Houdini specs should also be considered. At least regarding CSS Typed OM, we Chromium and WebKit have more than 90% interoperability.

Sebastian

[svgeesus]

I see

CSS Scoping 1 -> CSS Shadow
CSS Shadow Parts 1 -> CSS Shadow

However there isn't even an ED of CSS Shadow, far less a FPWD. So it seems premature to list these specs, last published in 2014 and 2018, under the new title until the work has been done to produce the spec itself.