Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-CSS2-20101207/
Editor's draft: http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/css2/
The following color coding convention is used for comments after the 7 December 2010 publication:
(There are currently no objections)
Issue 142. Summary: clarify terms like "ancestor box", whether referring to formatting structure or document tree. Spec contains only 3 instances of ancestor box. They are all in section 10.1. From: Bert Bos Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Sep/0126.html #4 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0363.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: No response
Issue 153. Summary: Clarify which box of a replaced element is vertical-aligned From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Jan/0030.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0236.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 159. Summary: Clarify definition of adjoining margins From: Bruno Fassino Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0015.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0237.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 179. Summary: Example in anonymous block boxes section is wrong From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0005.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0371.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0399.html Resolution: Replace replace second instance of "P" with "BODY" Status: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0727.html
Issue 181. Summary: use of 'height' in 10.8 causes confusion over content height and line-height wrt inline elements From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0010.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0587.html Resolution: rewrote text for issues 153 and 281 Status: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0635.html
Issue 192. Summary: Clarifications to float's effect on its shortened line From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0027.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0357.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0358.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0402.html Resolution: Accept change to - "If a shortened line box is too small to contain any content, then the line box is shifted downward (and its width recomputed) until either some content fits or there are no more floats present." Status: Accepted
Issue 197. Summary: Clarify application of 'clear' to run-ins. From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0404.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0248.html Notes: Run-in removed from CSS 2.1 Resolution: Defer to later CSS version
Issue 198. Summary: Clarify interaction of run-ins and "elements earlier in the source document". From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0376.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0247.html Notes: Run-in removed from CSS 2.1 Resolution: Defer to later CSS version
Issue 199. Summary: Define when line boxes are present From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010May/0698.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0372.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 203. Summary: Hypothetical border calculation should match actual border calculation From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0261.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0567.html Resolution: Proposal Accepted Status: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0570.html
Issue 204. Summary: Link 8.3.1 to clause about phantom line boxes From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0061.html 20d Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0255.html Resolution: Proposal Accepted
Issue 205. Summary: Clause about phantom line boxes should say "forced line break" instead of "line feed" From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0074.html 20a Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0256.html Resolution: Proposal Accepted
Issue 206. Summary: Comments on HASH grammar From: Mark Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0597.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0491.html Resolution: No change Status: No response
Issue 207. Summary: Clearance is discontinuous From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0569.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0254.html Resolution: Defer to errata Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0424.html
Issue 208. Summary: Horizontal scrollbars confuse width/height/etc calculations From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0544.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0303.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: No response
Issue 209. Summary: Does the root element establish a new block formatting context? From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0107.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0302.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: No response
Issue 210. Summary: 4.1.9 implies comments are not allowed at start or end of style sheet From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0510.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0301.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 211. Summary: Transitivity error in margin collapsing From: L. David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0439.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0304.html Resolution: No change Status: No response
Issue 212. Summary: Clarify that table wrapper boxes are containing blocks, even though table boxes are not in 9.2.1 From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Note: additional edits to 9.2.1 clarified this issue Resolution: No change
Issue 213. Summary: clarify that forced page breaks on the root element change whether :first is :left or :right From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0421.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0305.html Resolution: Make undefined for CSS2.1 Note: Defer to higher CSS level Status: No response
Issue 214. Summary: Make it undefined whether white space stripping happens before or after bidi reordering From: L. David Baron Comment: http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/blocking/bidi-004#discussion Response: None Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 215. Summary: Make it undefined what containing block is formed by a relpos inline that splits across multiple lines From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Resolution: Make undefined for CSS 2.1 Note: Defer to higher CSS level
Issue 216. Summary: Drop vertical-align from list of properties supported on ::first-line From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Note: Remove vertical-align from list of :first-line required properties Resolution: Proposal Accepted
Issue 218. Summary: Percentage intrinsic widths untestable From: L. David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0077.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0312.html Resolution: Remove concept of intrinsic height/width Status: Accepted
Issue 219. Summary: Clarify that Line Separator LS and other (non-collapsed) forced-break Unicode chars break the line From: IRC Comment: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20101111 Response: None Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 220. Summary: Clip does not respond to 'direction' in most implementations From: Arron Eicholz Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0174.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0314.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 221. Summary: Remove gamma-correction section From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Note: Remove gamma-correction section Resolution: Proposal Accepted
Issue 224. Summary: List style intrinsic sizing rules inconsistent with other image uses From: Tab Atkins Jr. Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Feb/0364.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0325.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 225. Summary: Auto height calculation rules confused about margin collapsing From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0108.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0316.html Resolution: No change Status: No response
Issue 226. Summary: White space processing clarifications From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0421.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0331.html Resolution: No change Note: Deferred to CSS3 Text (most issues) and errata (issues 4 and 5) Status: No response
Issue 227. Summary: Diagram caption out of date From: Patrick Garies Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0446.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0333.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 228. Summary: Add non-normative note pointing at min/max sections from auto width/height sections. From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0483.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0334.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 229. Summary: Floats effect on lines above placeholder From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0149.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0240.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: Accepted http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0309.html
Issue 230. Summary: List item numbering undefined From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0175.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0392.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 231. Summary: Make list-item-ness of root list-item optional From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0205.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0343.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 232. Summary: Define "in-flow" From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0310.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0348.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 233. Summary: text-indent percentages behavior very odd for table cells and floats From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0431.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0360.html Resolution: No change Status: Accepted
Issue 234. Summary: Margin-collapsing and min-height inconsistent implementations. From: Alan Gresley Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0649.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0356.html Resolution: No change Status: No response
Issue 235. Summary: Clarify that list of "direction" property effects is not exhaustive From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0728.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0206.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 236. Summary: Propagation of text-decoration to contents of tables From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0407.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0207.html Resolution: Defer to later CSS version Status: No response
Issue 237. Summary: Border conflict resolution unclear due to equivalence wording of outset/inset and groove/ridge From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0560.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0208.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 238. Summary: Clarify interpretation of system font keywords From: Gérard Talbot Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0622.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0209.html Resolution: Defer to later CSS version Status: No response
Issue 239. Summary: Propagate "direction" from BODY to ICB From: David Hyatt Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0750.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0210.html Resolution: No change Status: No response
Issue 240. Summary: Behavior of min/max width on table elements. From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0817.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0217.html Resolution: Defer to later CSS version Status: No response
Issue 241. Summary: position: static doesn't prevent computation of top/left/bottom/right From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0035.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0361.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 242. Summary: Exact behavior of inline split around block not defined. From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0047.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0222.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 243. Summary: Tables confused about which box is principal box From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0084.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0252.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 244. Summary: Rendering tree vs. element tree in z-order algo From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0069.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0362.html Resolution: No change Status: No response
Issue 245. Summary: Clarifications to z-index chapter From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0083.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0362.html Resolution: No change Status: No response
Issue 246. Summary: Improve clip examples From: Gérard Talbot Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0187.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0284.html Resolution: Defer to later CSS version Status: No response
Issue 247. Summary: Containing block of abspos inside block-in-inline split unclear & inconsistent From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0444.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0327.html Resolution: Defer to later CSS version Status: No response
Issue 248. Summary: Clarification for Floats with height: 0 From: Sylvain Galineau Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0020.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0328.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: No response
Issue 249. Summary: Add explanatory sentences to clarify clearance calculation. From: Gérard Talbot Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0120.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0335.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: No response
Issue 250. Summary: page grammar missing From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0211.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0285.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 251. Summary: Add longest-match tokenlization example From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0064.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0286.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: No response
Issue 252. Summary: Error-parsing rules confusion From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0068.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0287.html Resolution: Defer to later CSS version Status: No response
Issue 253. Summary: Clarify end-of-line as end-of-line character (vs. end-of-file) From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0091.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0288.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 254. Summary: Clarify "next block" when parsing invalid at-keywords From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0071.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0289.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: No response
Issue 255. Summary: Clarifications to HTML-related definitions From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0072.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0290.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 256. Summary: Clarify form controls and frames From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0072.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0291.html Resolution: No change Status: No response
Issue 257. Summary: Don't say that boxes have properties From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0073.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0336.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 258. Summary: Bad wording in uri() comment notes From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0074.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0292.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 259. Summary: Assigning of values via inheritance unclear From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0075.html issue 1 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0382.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 260. Summary: Note about anonymous box inheritance redundant From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0075.html issue 2 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0383.html Resolution: No change Status: No response
Issue 261. Summary: Clarify "other attributes" in specificity calculations From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0075.html issue 3 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0383.html Resolution: No change Status: No response
Issue 262. Summary: Editorial issues in Ch 8 From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0076.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0384.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: No response
Issue 263. Summary: Editorial simplification to 9.4.1 BFC root definition From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0077.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0385.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: No response
Issue 264. Summary: Clarify that float shortening note is wrt margin box From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0078.html issue 1 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0386.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 265. Summary: Clarify which table box is affected by float overlap restriction From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0078.html issue 2 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0387.html Resolution: No change Status: No response
Issue 266. Summary: Issue 120 follow-up From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0079.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0390.html Resolution: Proposal accepted for Issue 6, Defer the rest to errata Status: No response
Issue 267. Summary: Clarify that block-in-relpos'd-inline doesn't get position: relative z-index side-effects From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0086.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0391.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 268. Summary: Perceived error in text-indent example of first formatted line From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0085.html issue 1 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0226.html Resolution: No change Status: No response
Issue 269. Summary: Justification should be wrt line box, not block container From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0085.html issue 2 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0226.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 270. Summary: Make text-decoration propagation more clearly recursive From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0085.html issue 3 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0226.html Resolution: Defer to later CSS version Status: No response
Issue 271. Summary: Make list-item's additional boxes clause example rather than exhaustive From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0087.html issue 1 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0225.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: No response
Issue 272. Summary: Adopt CSS3 exit criteria for CSS2.1 From: CSSWG Resolution: Update CSS2.1 exit criteria to match CSS3. No 30-day waiting period.
Issue 273. Summary: Wording incorrect for RTL text next to floats From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0058.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0227.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: No response
Issue 274. Summary: No shortening of line boxes next to later floats From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0131.html issue 1 Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0148.html first half Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0150.html first third Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0228.html Resolution: Edit CSS2.1 to specify that line boxes are not shortened by a float that occurs after them Status: No response
Issue 275. Summary: vertical gap possible between line boxes in presence of floats From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0358.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0230.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 276. Summary: :first-line, :first-letter under defined From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0097.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0231.html Resolution: Edit CSS2.1 by adding a note indicating remaining cases are undefined for 2.1 Status: No response
Issue 277. Summary: usage of "rule" incorrect in many cases From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0101.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0232.html Resolution: Defer to errata Status: No response
Issue 278. Summary: floats and margin box From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jan/0352.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0279.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0233.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 279. Summary: new wording about "next to" floats From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0130.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0234.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 280. Summary: left float can be to the right of a right float From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0131.html issue 2 Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0150.html second third Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0240.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 281. Summary: 'line-height' is a property (and its values are 'quantities') not a physical entity; nothing can "start" there From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0004.html issue 3b Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009May/0191.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0242.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 282. Summary: No passes for background-intrinsic-004 and background-intrinsic-005 From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 283. Summary: No passes for replaced-intrinsic-ratio-001 From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 284. Summary: CSS2.1 exit criteria differ from CSS3 From: =WG= Comment: None Response: None Resolution: Duplicate of issue 272
Issue 285. Summary: Clearance moving things up (revisited) From: Anton Prowse Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0474.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0427.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0531.html Resolution: Proposal accepted
Issue 286. Summary: Clearance example confusing and self-contradictory From: Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0569.html Response: Resolution: No change Status: No response